From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/symtab] Fix assert in write_one_signatured_type
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:16:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3814251-039d-0c88-6145-1e122c224113@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201144321.GA1874@delia>
On 2021-02-01 9:43 a.m., Tom de Vries wrote:> Hi,
>
> When running test-case gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.exp with target board
> cc-with-gdb-index, we run into an abort during the generation of the gdb-index
> by cc-with-tweaks.sh:
> ...
> build/gdb/testsuite/cache/gdb.sh: line 1: 27275 Aborted (core dumped)
> ...
>
> This can be reproduced on the command line like this:
> ...
> $ gdb -batch ./outputs/gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread/fission-reread \
> -ex 'save gdb-index ./outputs/gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread'
> warning: Could not find DWO TU fission-reread.dwo(0x9022f1ceac7e8b19) \
> referenced by TU at offset 0x0 [in module fission-reread]
> warning: Could not find DWO CU fission-reread.dwo(0x807060504030201) \
> referenced by CU at offset 0x561 [in module fission-reread]
> Aborted (core dumped)
> ...
>
> The abort is a segfault due to a using a nullptr psymtab in
> write_one_signatured_type.
>
> The problem is that we're trying to write index entries for the type unit
> with signature:
> ...
> (gdb) p /x entry->signature
> $2 = 0x9022f1ceac7e8b19
> ...
> which is a skeleton type unit:
> ...
> Contents of the .debug_types section:
>
> Compilation Unit @ offset 0x0:
> Length: 0x4a (32-bit)
> Version: 4
> Abbrev Offset: 0x165
> Pointer Size: 4
> Signature: 0x9022f1ceac7e8b19
> Type Offset: 0x0
> <0><17>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_type_unit)
> <18> DW_AT_comp_dir : /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite
> <2f> DW_AT_GNU_dwo_name: fission-reread.dwo
> <42> DW_AT_GNU_pubnames: 0x0
> <46> DW_AT_GNU_pubtypes: 0x0
> <4a> DW_AT_GNU_addr_base: 0x0
> ...
> referring to a .dwo file, but as the warnings show, the .dwo file is not
> found.
>
> Fix this by skipping the type unit in write_one_signatured_type if
> psymtab == nullptr.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>
> Any comments?
>
> Thanks,
> - Tom
>
> [gdb/symtab] Fix assert in write_one_signatured_type
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2021-02-01 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
>
> PR symtab/24620
> * dwarf2/index-write.c (write_one_signatured_type): Skip if
> psymtab == nullptr.
>
> ---
> gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c b/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
> index 66781feaf46..a7b9ae66cae 100644
> --- a/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
> +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
> @@ -616,6 +616,14 @@ write_one_signatured_type (void **slot, void *d)
> struct signatured_type *entry = (struct signatured_type *) *slot;
> partial_symtab *psymtab = entry->per_cu.v.psymtab;
>
> + if (psymtab == nullptr)
> + {
> + /* We can end up here when processing a skeleton CU referring to a
> + .dwo file that hasn't been found. There's not much we can do in
> + such a case, so skip this CU. */
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> write_psymbols (info->symtab, info->psyms_seen,
> psymtab->global_psymbols, info->cu_index,
> 0);
>
LGTM, some questions:
1. Do we need to emit a warning here? Probably not because another one
should have been emitted earlier, when parsing symbols. But I thought
I'd ask just in case.
2. Would it be somewhat easy to write a test for this? Have a type unit
with a dwo, delete the dwo, try to generate an index.
3. Is the same situation correctly handled for standard compile units?
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-01 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 14:43 Tom de Vries
2021-02-01 16:16 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-02-02 8:34 ` Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3814251-039d-0c88-6145-1e122c224113@polymtl.ca \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox