From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/symtab] Fix assert in write_one_signatured_type
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:34:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40ead098-8fed-1bdc-cf03-f2fb135d606b@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3814251-039d-0c88-6145-1e122c224113@polymtl.ca>
On 2/1/21 5:16 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2021-02-01 9:43 a.m., Tom de Vries wrote:> Hi,
>>
>> When running test-case gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.exp with target board
>> cc-with-gdb-index, we run into an abort during the generation of the gdb-index
>> by cc-with-tweaks.sh:
>> ...
>> build/gdb/testsuite/cache/gdb.sh: line 1: 27275 Aborted (core dumped)
>> ...
>>
>> This can be reproduced on the command line like this:
>> ...
>> $ gdb -batch ./outputs/gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread/fission-reread \
>> -ex 'save gdb-index ./outputs/gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread'
>> warning: Could not find DWO TU fission-reread.dwo(0x9022f1ceac7e8b19) \
>> referenced by TU at offset 0x0 [in module fission-reread]
>> warning: Could not find DWO CU fission-reread.dwo(0x807060504030201) \
>> referenced by CU at offset 0x561 [in module fission-reread]
>> Aborted (core dumped)
>> ...
>>
>> The abort is a segfault due to a using a nullptr psymtab in
>> write_one_signatured_type.
>>
>> The problem is that we're trying to write index entries for the type unit
>> with signature:
>> ...
>> (gdb) p /x entry->signature
>> $2 = 0x9022f1ceac7e8b19
>> ...
>> which is a skeleton type unit:
>> ...
>> Contents of the .debug_types section:
>>
>> Compilation Unit @ offset 0x0:
>> Length: 0x4a (32-bit)
>> Version: 4
>> Abbrev Offset: 0x165
>> Pointer Size: 4
>> Signature: 0x9022f1ceac7e8b19
>> Type Offset: 0x0
>> <0><17>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_type_unit)
>> <18> DW_AT_comp_dir : /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite
>> <2f> DW_AT_GNU_dwo_name: fission-reread.dwo
>> <42> DW_AT_GNU_pubnames: 0x0
>> <46> DW_AT_GNU_pubtypes: 0x0
>> <4a> DW_AT_GNU_addr_base: 0x0
>> ...
>> referring to a .dwo file, but as the warnings show, the .dwo file is not
>> found.
>>
>> Fix this by skipping the type unit in write_one_signatured_type if
>> psymtab == nullptr.
>>
>> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>>
>> Any comments?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Tom
>>
>> [gdb/symtab] Fix assert in write_one_signatured_type
>>
>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2021-02-01 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
>>
>> PR symtab/24620
>> * dwarf2/index-write.c (write_one_signatured_type): Skip if
>> psymtab == nullptr.
>>
>> ---
>> gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c b/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
>> index 66781feaf46..a7b9ae66cae 100644
>> --- a/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
>> +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
>> @@ -616,6 +616,14 @@ write_one_signatured_type (void **slot, void *d)
>> struct signatured_type *entry = (struct signatured_type *) *slot;
>> partial_symtab *psymtab = entry->per_cu.v.psymtab;
>>
>> + if (psymtab == nullptr)
>> + {
>> + /* We can end up here when processing a skeleton CU referring to a
>> + .dwo file that hasn't been found. There's not much we can do in
>> + such a case, so skip this CU. */
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> write_psymbols (info->symtab, info->psyms_seen,
>> psymtab->global_psymbols, info->cu_index,
>> 0);
>>
> LGTM, some questions:
>
> 1. Do we need to emit a warning here? Probably not because another one
> should have been emitted earlier, when parsing symbols. But I thought
> I'd ask just in case.
>
Yeah, I think the existing warning is sufficient.
> 2. Would it be somewhat easy to write a test for this? Have a type unit
> with a dwo, delete the dwo, try to generate an index.
>
I've added a test-case to fission-reread.exp.
> 3. Is the same situation correctly handled for standard compile units?
I've tried the following experiment: I've done a gdb testsuite run with
target board fission-dwp, with a hack added to cc-with-tweaks.sh to
remove the .dwp file. Apart from a lot of FAILs, all I ran into was
PR27313 "Segfault in insert_catch_syscall" (
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27313 ).
Committed with test-case added.
Thanks,
- Tom
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-02 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 14:43 Tom de Vries
2021-02-01 16:16 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-02-02 8:34 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40ead098-8fed-1bdc-cf03-f2fb135d606b@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox