Re: [RFA] Remove a cleanup from call_function_by_hand_dummy

[Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>]

On 2018-02-17 11:11, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This removes a cleanup from call_function_by_hand_dummy, replacing
> manual allocation with std::vector.
> 
> Regression tested by the buildbot.
> 
> gdb/ChangeLog
> 2018-02-16  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>
> 
> 	* infcall.c (call_function_by_hand_dummy): Use std::vector.
> ---
>  gdb/ChangeLog |  4 ++++
>  gdb/infcall.c | 14 ++++----------
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/infcall.c b/gdb/infcall.c
> index 8b75297251..6ff725a815 100644
> --- a/gdb/infcall.c
> +++ b/gdb/infcall.c
> @@ -732,7 +732,6 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value 
> *function,
>    struct type *ftype = check_typedef (value_type (function));
>    CORE_ADDR bp_addr;
>    struct frame_id dummy_id;
> -  struct cleanup *args_cleanup;
>    struct frame_info *frame;
>    struct gdbarch *gdbarch;
>    struct cleanup *terminate_bp_cleanup;
> @@ -1054,21 +1053,18 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value 
> *function,
>  	}
>      }
> 
> +  std::vector<struct value *> new_args;
>    if (hidden_first_param_p)
>      {
> -      struct value **new_args;
> -
>        /* Add the new argument to the front of the argument list.  */
> -      new_args = XNEWVEC (struct value *, nargs + 1);
> +      new_args.reserve (nargs + 1);

This should probably be resize instead of reserve.  When you call 
reserve, it doesn't change the actual length of the vector.  You could 
then use a def_vector to avoid unneeded zero-initialization by the 
resize operation.

Other than that, LGTM.

Simon