From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/10] remote_target::m_remote_state, pointer -> object (Re: [PATCH 10/10] remote: one struct remote_state per struct remote_target)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 05:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3998277034fcc352a54bfe542132e53@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d9a613f-b420-aa72-8561-549b383285fa@redhat.com>
On 2018-05-24 11:53, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 06:30 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 05/22/2018 04:37 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>
>>> Is there a reason not to make the remote_state object a simple field
>>> of remote_target, does it have to be a pointer? You would have to
>>> shuffle things around a little bit more, but it seems to work fine.
>>
>> Yeah, no reason other than struct remote_state not being complete yet
>> when the field is defined in struct remote_target. I was thinking the
>> moving would be done as follow up, to avoid even more churn mixed in
>> with
>> changes, very much like patch #4 started with a pointer and then patch
>> #5
>> moved to objects.
> Like this?
Yep, looks good!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-25 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 14:18 [PATCH 00/10] remote: More multi-target preparation Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 14:18 ` [PATCH 09/10] remote: Make vcont_builder a class Pedro Alves
2018-05-22 5:07 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-22 21:33 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 14:18 ` [PATCH 10/10] remote: one struct remote_state per struct remote_target Pedro Alves
2018-05-22 5:07 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-22 21:06 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-24 17:00 ` [PATCH 11/10] remote_target::m_remote_state, pointer -> object (Re: [PATCH 10/10] remote: one struct remote_state per struct remote_target) Pedro Alves
2018-05-25 5:23 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2018-05-16 14:18 ` [PATCH 02/10] remote: Eliminate remote_hostio_close_cleanup Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 17:43 ` Tom Tromey
2018-05-16 18:53 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 19:46 ` Tom Tromey
2018-05-18 21:04 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-16 14:18 ` [PATCH 01/10] remote: struct remote_state, use op new Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 20:57 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-21 15:36 ` [PATCH 1.2 01/10] remote: struct remote_state, use op new, fix leaks Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 03/10] remote: Make readahead_cache a C++ class Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:06 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 05/10] remote: remote_arch_state pointers -> remote_arch_state objects Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:17 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-18 21:18 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-21 16:12 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 14:27 ` [PATCH 04/10] remote: multiple remote_arch_state instances per arch Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:09 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-16 14:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] Handle "show remote memory-write-packet-size" when not connected Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:42 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-21 20:41 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-22 3:37 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-22 21:55 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-05-22 23:26 ` [pushed] Fix gdb.base/remote.exp with native-extended-gdbserver board (Re: [PATCH 08/10] Handle "show remote memory-write-packet-size" when not connected) Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 15:46 ` [PATCH 07/10] remote: Move discard_pending_stop_replies call Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:29 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-16 15:50 ` [PATCH 06/10] remote: Small cleanup in compare_section_command Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:26 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b3998277034fcc352a54bfe542132e53@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox