From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] Handle "show remote memory-write-packet-size" when not connected
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 21:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28ff1dac-fa38-6e19-fd0e-b4aed7e1832f@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180516141830.16859-9-palves@redhat.com>
On 2018-05-16 10:18 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Currently "show remote memory-write-packet-size" says that the packet
> size is limited to whatever is stored in the remote_state global, even
> if not connected to a target.
>
> When we get to support multiple instances of remote targets, there
> won't be a remote_state global anymore, so that must be replaced by
> something else.
>
> Since it doesn't make sense to print the limit of the packet size of a
> non-existing connection, this patch makes us say that the limit will
> be further reduced when we connect.
>
> The text is taken from the command's online help, which says:
>
> "The actual limit is further reduced dependent on the target."
The result sounds a bit weird:
(gdb) show remote memory-read-packet-size
The memory-read-packet-size is 0. The actual limit will be further reduced dependent on the target.
(gdb) show remote memory-write-packet-size
The memory-write-packet-size is 0. The actual limit will be further reduced dependent on the target.
How can the limit be reduced if it is zero? I don't really know about
this code, is zero a special value that means no limit? Perhaps it should be
handled differently to make the message clearer.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-18 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 14:18 [PATCH 00/10] remote: More multi-target preparation Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 14:18 ` [PATCH 09/10] remote: Make vcont_builder a class Pedro Alves
2018-05-22 5:07 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-22 21:33 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 14:18 ` [PATCH 02/10] remote: Eliminate remote_hostio_close_cleanup Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 17:43 ` Tom Tromey
2018-05-16 18:53 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 19:46 ` Tom Tromey
2018-05-18 21:04 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-16 14:18 ` [PATCH 01/10] remote: struct remote_state, use op new Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 20:57 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-21 15:36 ` [PATCH 1.2 01/10] remote: struct remote_state, use op new, fix leaks Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 14:18 ` [PATCH 10/10] remote: one struct remote_state per struct remote_target Pedro Alves
2018-05-22 5:07 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-22 21:06 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-24 17:00 ` [PATCH 11/10] remote_target::m_remote_state, pointer -> object (Re: [PATCH 10/10] remote: one struct remote_state per struct remote_target) Pedro Alves
2018-05-25 5:23 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 05/10] remote: remote_arch_state pointers -> remote_arch_state objects Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:17 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-18 21:18 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-21 16:12 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 03/10] remote: Make readahead_cache a C++ class Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:06 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-16 14:27 ` [PATCH 04/10] remote: multiple remote_arch_state instances per arch Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:09 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-16 14:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] Handle "show remote memory-write-packet-size" when not connected Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:42 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2018-05-21 20:41 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-22 3:37 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-22 21:55 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-05-22 23:26 ` [pushed] Fix gdb.base/remote.exp with native-extended-gdbserver board (Re: [PATCH 08/10] Handle "show remote memory-write-packet-size" when not connected) Pedro Alves
2018-05-16 15:46 ` [PATCH 07/10] remote: Move discard_pending_stop_replies call Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:29 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-16 15:50 ` [PATCH 06/10] remote: Small cleanup in compare_section_command Pedro Alves
2018-05-18 21:26 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28ff1dac-fa38-6e19-fd0e-b4aed7e1832f@ericsson.com \
--to=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox