Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@mips.com>
To: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org"	<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] btrace, gdbserver: remove the to_supports_btrace target method
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1802262138400.3553@tp.orcam.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3bmgbpn0l.fsf@oc1027705133.ibm.com>

Hi Markus,

 Thank you for the quick action on this problem.

On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, Andreas Arnez wrote:

> >> Process .../gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/advance/advance created; pid =
> >> 25519 Listening on port 2346 target remote 1.2.3.4:2346 Remote debugging using
> >> 1.2.3.4:2346 Reading symbols from .../lib/ld.so.1...done.
> >> 0x77fc8de0 in __start () from .../lib/ld.so.1 Protocol error: qXfer:btrace-conf
> >> (read-btrace-conf) conflicting enabled responses.
> >> (gdb) continue
> >> The program is not being run.
> >> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/advance.exp: can't run to main
> >> 
> >> See the attached RSP packet exchange log for details.  Please investigate.
> 
> For the record, the same happens on s390x.  It seems that you broke all
> targets without HAVE_LINUX_BTRACE.

 I suspected that might be the case.  With your future changes that touch 
generic code would you please regression-test them with another target, or 
at least ask people to do so before committing them, so that such a wide 
breakage is avoided?  Having several versions not working at all makes it 
a pain to bisect changes that may have caused regressions meanwhile.

 Also did you verify that old-GDB/new-gdbserver and new-GDB/old-gdbserver 
combinations work correctly?

> > Below is a patch to address this.  I tested it on IA by undefining HAVE_LINUX_BTRACE.
> > Does it fix the issue you reported?
> 
> I've tested your patch on s390x, and it seems to fix the problem.

 I have smoke-tested your change with `gdb.base/advance.exp' and one of 
the configurations that failed previously, and it has scored all-pass now.  
I'll schedule full testing overnight.

  Maciej


  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-26 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-26 14:14 [PATCH v2 0/7] improve btrace enable error reporting Markus Metzger
2018-01-26 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] common: add scoped_fd Markus Metzger
2018-02-13 16:48   ` Yao Qi
2018-02-13 17:28     ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-02-14 15:22       ` Yao Qi
2018-02-14 17:26         ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-02-19 15:28           ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-02-20 10:12             ` Yao Qi
2018-02-20 10:46               ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-01-26 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] btrace, gdbserver: remove the to_supports_btrace target method Markus Metzger
2018-02-24 16:51   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2018-02-26 13:08     ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-02-26 19:30       ` Andreas Arnez
2018-02-26 21:58         ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2018-02-27 10:57           ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-02-27 15:32             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2018-02-27 18:14               ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-02-28 10:29                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2018-02-28 11:09                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2018-02-28 11:24                     ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-02-28 12:53                       ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-02-28 15:55                         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2018-02-28 16:08                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-28 12:00     ` Yao Qi
2018-02-28 16:27       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-03-01 11:33         ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-03-01 19:27           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-03-05 12:14             ` Yao Qi
     [not found]               ` <87lgf64i24.fsf@redhat.com>
2018-03-06  9:02                 ` Yao Qi
2018-03-06 16:32                   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-03-01 19:34           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2018-01-26 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] btrace: prepare for throwing exceptions when enabling btrace Markus Metzger
2018-01-26 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] btrace: improve enable error messages Markus Metzger
2018-01-26 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] btrace, gdbserver: use exceptions to convey btrace enable/disable errors Markus Metzger
2018-01-26 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] common: add scoped_mmap Markus Metzger
2018-02-06 16:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] improve btrace enable error reporting Pedro Alves
2018-02-07 10:41   ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-02-07 12:11     ` Pedro Alves
2018-02-08 10:40       ` Metzger, Markus T
     [not found]         ` <9ce0c90a-5c71-0a7d-3779-f826369a95ec@redhat.com>
2018-02-08 13:49           ` Metzger, Markus T

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1802262138400.3553@tp.orcam.me.uk \
    --to=macro@mips.com \
    --cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox