Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [committed][gdb] Fix prop->const_val uses in gdbtypes.c
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 08:46:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a41c48cd-46c8-51e0-8c84-cfde92478a98@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d17e07ac-a5e3-05bc-38d3-b441df1ddc46@suse.de>

On 2020-08-05 6:33 a.m., Tom de Vries wrote:
> [ was: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gdb: remove TYPE_DYN_PROP_ADDR ]
> 
> On 8/5/20 11:20 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 8/2/20 1:59 AM, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:
>>> Remove TYPE_DYN_PROP_ADDR, replacing its uses with calling
>>> dynamic_prop::const_val directly.
>>>
>>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 	* gdbtypes.h (TYPE_DYN_PROP_ADDR): Remove, replace uses with
>>> 	dynamic_prop::const_val.
>>>
>>
>>
>> This patch causes the following regression for me:
>> ...
>> FAIL: gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.exp: print this%_data%b
>> ...
>> (and 185 more, all for fortran test-cases).
>>
>>>    return (prop != nullptr && prop->kind () == PROP_CONST
>>> -	  && !TYPE_DYN_PROP_ADDR (prop));
>>> +	  && prop->const_val () != 0);
>>>  }
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, isn't that supposed to be "== 0" ?
> 
> Committed patch that fixes the regressions.
> 
> Thanks,
> - Tom
> 

Arggh, thanks for fixing this.

Simon


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-05 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-01 23:59 [PATCH 0/3] Remove last dynamic prop macros Simon Marchi
2020-08-01 23:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] gdb: remove TYPE_DYN_PROP_BATON Simon Marchi
2020-08-01 23:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] gdb: remove TYPE_DYN_PROP_KIND Simon Marchi
2020-08-01 23:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] gdb: remove TYPE_DYN_PROP_ADDR Simon Marchi
2020-08-05  9:20   ` Tom de Vries
2020-08-05 10:33     ` [committed][gdb] Fix prop->const_val uses in gdbtypes.c Tom de Vries
2020-08-05 12:46       ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2020-08-05 12:56         ` Tom de Vries
2020-08-04 18:06 ` [PATCH 0/3] Remove last dynamic prop macros Tom Tromey
2020-08-04 18:48   ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a41c48cd-46c8-51e0-8c84-cfde92478a98@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox