From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Jiri Smid <smid@suse.cz>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: x86_64 target files
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 08:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010802183244.3639C-100000@is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s8vg0baa6hb.fsf@naga.suse.cz>
On 2 Aug 2001, Jiri Smid wrote:
> This is the related new files for x86-64 target.
What is x86-64, exactly? Some of the files seem to hint that it's an AMD
CPU, but others just say x86-64.
If this is a new target, I think it should be added to NEWS in the
appropriate section.
> * x86_64-linux-tdep.c: New file.
> * x86_64-linux-nat.c: New file.
These 2 file names clash after truncation to 8+3, so they should be added
to config/djgpp/fnchange.lst, which see.
> + int
> + x86_64_insert_watchpoint (ptid_t ptid, CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int rw)
> + {
> + return x86_64_insert_aligned_watchpoint (ptid, addr, addr, len, rw);
> + }
> +
> + static int
> + x86_64_insert_aligned_watchpoint (ptid_t ptid, CORE_ADDR waddr, CORE_ADDR addr,
> + int len, int rw)
This and the rest of watchpoint support is based on the old code from
i386v-nat.c. Isn't it much better to use the approach in i386-nat.c
instead? Most of the ia32 targets now use code from i386-nat.c, and thus
support watchpoint sharing, and have a few subtle bugs in the previous
code solved. I think it makes sense to base this new target on the new
code rather than on the old one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-02 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-02 7:20 Jiri Smid
2001-08-02 8:39 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2001-08-02 9:37 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-08-02 9:43 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-08-09 22:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-08-09 23:12 ` config/i386/xm-x86_64.h; Was " Andrew Cagney
2001-08-09 23:25 ` configure.host; Was: " Andrew Cagney
2001-08-09 23:41 ` configure.tgt; " Andrew Cagney
2001-08-09 23:57 ` Misc; " Andrew Cagney
2001-08-30 1:35 ` Jiri Smid
2001-08-30 7:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-08-30 11:03 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-08-30 16:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-08-31 0:13 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-08-31 2:00 ` i386 flavors [Was: Re: Misc; Was: [RFA]: x86_64 target files] Andreas Jaeger
2001-08-31 10:39 ` Misc; Was: [RFA]: x86_64 target files Andrew Cagney
2001-08-31 13:12 ` Andreas Jaeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SUN.3.91.1010802183244.3639C-100000@is \
--to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=smid@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox