From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: kettenis@science.uva.nl, msnyder@cygnus.com,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Make Linux use the new unified x86 watchpoint support
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010328111631.4337A-100000@is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200103271350.f2RDoeY17397@deneb.localdomain>
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Mark Salter wrote:
> When a read wathcpoint is triggered, the target stops and informs gdb.
> In breakpoint.c, gdb sees that there are read or access watchpoints set
> and that the data address reported by the target matches. This causes
> watchpoint_check() to be called. The problem is that watchpoint_check()
> will try to read from the watched data area to see if it changed, but
> this is done before gdb has removed watchpoints from the target. This
> causes the target to respond with an error when gdb tries to access the
> watched area.
Sorry, I don't understand: why does reading a watched region generate
an error? At least in the x86 implementation, watchpoints are set to
be task-local, so reading the data from GDB, which is another process,
should not produce any errors. Am I missing something?
Could you please post a reproducible test case where this happens, and
tell what host/target do you see that with?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-28 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-21 18:47 Mark Kettenis
2001-03-26 18:14 ` Michael Snyder
2001-03-27 0:46 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-03-27 8:45 ` Michael Snyder
2001-04-17 17:26 ` Michael Snyder
2001-04-17 23:58 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-03-26 18:35 ` Michael Snyder
2001-03-26 22:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-27 1:13 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-03-27 1:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-27 2:09 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-03-27 2:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-27 10:58 ` Mark Salter
2001-03-28 1:19 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2001-03-28 5:10 ` Mark Salter
2001-03-28 5:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-28 8:06 ` Mark Salter
2001-03-29 12:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-29 12:03 ` Mark Salter
2001-03-27 8:55 ` Michael Snyder
2001-03-27 9:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-27 9:55 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-03-27 11:59 ` Michael Snyder
2001-03-27 12:04 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-03-27 11:58 ` Michael Snyder
2001-03-28 1:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-28 2:03 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-03-27 8:52 ` Michael Snyder
2001-03-27 15:51 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-03-27 10:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-03-27 8:48 ` Michael Snyder
2001-03-27 9:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-27 11:57 ` Michael Snyder
2001-03-28 1:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-28 11:53 ` Michael Snyder
2001-03-29 12:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010329160617.4915G-100000@is>
2001-03-29 18:15 ` Mark Salter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SUN.3.91.1010328111631.4337A-100000@is \
--to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kettenis@science.uva.nl \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox