Re: [commit] gdb_byte part of ppc

[Manoj Iyer <manjo@austin.ibm.com>]

I send out a similar patch for review yestarday and it covers a few more
files, any comments on that one? Would you like a similar patch for
sim/ppc files?

-----
manjo
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Cogito ergo sum                                                          +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

On Wed, 25 May 2005, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> M.M. Kettenis wrote:
> > Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> >> these files, for the moment, get past gcc4
> >
> >
> > Great!  Have you been able to test i386 with gcc4 lately?
>
> You can try.  However, let me rephrase the above:
>
> These files, along with a few others, do get past gcc4 -Werror.  Many
> don't, gdb_byte being just one problem.  gcc4 -Werror continues to be
> pretty much useless.
>
> >  I think I've
> > done most of the conversion, but I haven't been able to install gcc4 on
> > my systems yet, and I won't be able to do so until I'm back home.
> >
> > Anyway, I've seen a lot of breakage from -Werror lately.  I really think
> > we should make that the default, at least for cvs version, after we've
> > fixed all the gdb_byte fallout.  Otherwise this will never be fixed
> > proberly.
>
> Like binutils?  Sounds like something for gdb@
>