From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1493 invoked by alias); 25 May 2005 15:09:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 514 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2005 15:08:39 -0000 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e34.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.132) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2005 15:08:39 +0000 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4PF8acE225736 for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 11:08:36 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j4PF8a3f134246 for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 09:08:36 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4PF8Z9F026975 for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 09:08:35 -0600 Received: from austin.ibm.com (netmail2.austin.ibm.com [9.41.248.176]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4PF8ZDG026970; Wed, 25 May 2005 09:08:35 -0600 Received: from lazy.austin.ibm.com (lazy.austin.ibm.com [9.53.94.97]) by austin.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j4PF8YUf058616; Wed, 25 May 2005 10:08:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 23:54:00 -0000 From: Manoj Iyer X-X-Sender: manjo@lazy To: Andrew Cagney cc: "M.M. Kettenis" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit] gdb_byte part of ppc In-Reply-To: <429476B0.3010506@gnu.org> Message-ID: References: <7320911886087069@webhare> <429476B0.3010506@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00544.txt.bz2 I send out a similar patch for review yestarday and it covers a few more files, any comments on that one? Would you like a similar patch for sim/ppc files? ----- manjo +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Cogito ergo sum + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On Wed, 25 May 2005, Andrew Cagney wrote: > M.M. Kettenis wrote: > > Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > >> these files, for the moment, get past gcc4 > > > > > > Great! Have you been able to test i386 with gcc4 lately? > > You can try. However, let me rephrase the above: > > These files, along with a few others, do get past gcc4 -Werror. Many > don't, gdb_byte being just one problem. gcc4 -Werror continues to be > pretty much useless. > > > I think I've > > done most of the conversion, but I haven't been able to install gcc4 on > > my systems yet, and I won't be able to do so until I'm back home. > > > > Anyway, I've seen a lot of breakage from -Werror lately. I really think > > we should make that the default, at least for cvs version, after we've > > fixed all the gdb_byte fallout. Otherwise this will never be fixed > > proberly. > > Like binutils? Sounds like something for gdb@ >