From: "Theodore A. Roth" <troth@openavr.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC:avr] use regcache instead of read_register
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 17:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0306201003210.9653@knuth.amplepower.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EF317E8.8070209@redhat.com>
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The ARI caught this and it seems like a trivial change. There is a bit of
> > confusion though in the use of current_regcache since the ARI says this:
> >
> > current regcache 57 Replace current_regcache with explict parameter
> >
> > What would that explicit parameter be?
> >
> > If this patch is ok, it brings the ARI count for the AVR down to 0.
>
> The patch is great. Don't be too worried about current_regcache for
> the moment.
>
> As for what parameter will be added to read_pc, I can give you several
> guesses:
>
> - made redundant by unwind_pc(frame)
> - replaced with something that takes the thread id and stop status
>
> The underlying problem is decr pc after break. Cleaning up that also
> involves read_pc, write_pc, and the update frame pc hack.
>
> Andrew
Thanks.
Committed.
I guess a similar change to d10v_read_pc.
Just noticed that the d10v seems to use d10v_unwind_sp instead of
*_read_sp. Is it a direct replacement to replace *_read_sp with
*_unwind_sp? I didn't see that before I did the commit.
Ted Roth
>
>
> > 2003-06-19 Theodore A. Roth <troth@openavr.org>
> >
> > * avr-tdep.c (avr_read_pc): Use regcache instead of read_register.
> > (avr_read_sp): Ditto.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2003-06-19 Theodore A. Roth <troth@openavr.org>
> >
> > * avr-tdep.c (avr_read_pc): Use regcache instead of read_register.
> > (avr_read_sp): Ditto.
> >
> > Index: avr-tdep.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/avr-tdep.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.64
> > diff -u -r1.64 avr-tdep.c
> > --- avr-tdep.c 20 Jun 2003 05:53:42 -0000 1.64
> > +++ avr-tdep.c 20 Jun 2003 06:09:27 -0000
> > @@ -324,12 +324,12 @@
> > avr_read_pc (ptid_t ptid)
> > {
> > ptid_t save_ptid;
> > - CORE_ADDR pc;
> > + ULONGEST pc;
> > CORE_ADDR retval;
> >
> > save_ptid = inferior_ptid;
> > inferior_ptid = ptid;
> > - pc = (int) read_register (AVR_PC_REGNUM);
> > + regcache_cooked_read_unsigned (current_regcache, AVR_PC_REGNUM, &pc);
> > inferior_ptid = save_ptid;
> > retval = avr_make_iaddr (pc);
> > return retval;
> > @@ -349,7 +349,10 @@
> > static CORE_ADDR
> > avr_read_sp (void)
> > {
> > - return (avr_make_saddr (read_register (AVR_SP_REGNUM)));
> > + ULONGEST sp;
> > +
> > + regcache_cooked_read_unsigned (current_regcache, AVR_SP_REGNUM, &sp);
> > + return (avr_make_saddr (sp));
> > }
> >
> > static int
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-20 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-20 6:22 Theodore A. Roth
2003-06-20 14:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-20 17:09 ` Theodore A. Roth [this message]
2003-06-20 17:39 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0306201003210.9653@knuth.amplepower.com \
--to=troth@openavr.org \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox