From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [RFA] scope_breakpoint -> internal breakpoint
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208201122180.1421-100000@valrhona.uglyboxes.com> (raw)
Hi,
When a watchpoint is set on a local variable, GDB sets a breakpoint of
type bp_watchpoint_scope to detect when the watchpoint is out of scope.
Right now, it does this using a "user-visible" breakpoint number (>0).
This patch changes this so that this internal breakpoint is created as an
internal breakpoint (<0). Section 5.1.2 of the user manual makes no
mention of this breakpoint, so I am suggesting that we make it one of the
optionally-displayed internal breakpoints.
I've run this through the testsuite and it introduces no new failures.
Keith
ChangeLog
2002-08-20 Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
* breakpoints.c (watch_command_1): Use internal breakpoint
when setting a watchpoint_scope breakpoint.
Patch
Index: breakpoint.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/breakpoint.c,v
retrieving revision 1.80
diff -p -r1.80 breakpoint.c
*** breakpoint.c 17 Aug 2002 06:12:52 -0000 1.80
--- breakpoint.c 20 Aug 2002 18:19:42 -0000
*************** watch_command_1 (char *arg, int accessfl
*** 5331,5346 ****
if (prev_frame)
{
struct breakpoint *scope_breakpoint;
! struct symtab_and_line scope_sal;
!
! INIT_SAL (&scope_sal); /* initialize to zeroes */
! scope_sal.pc = get_frame_pc (prev_frame);
! scope_sal.section = find_pc_overlay (scope_sal.pc);
!
! scope_breakpoint = set_raw_breakpoint (scope_sal,
! bp_watchpoint_scope);
! set_breakpoint_count (breakpoint_count + 1);
! scope_breakpoint->number = breakpoint_count;
scope_breakpoint->enable_state = bp_enabled;
--- 5331,5338 ----
if (prev_frame)
{
struct breakpoint *scope_breakpoint;
! scope_breakpoint = create_internal_breakpoint (get_frame_pc (prev_frame),
! bp_watchpoint_scope);
scope_breakpoint->enable_state = bp_enabled;
next reply other threads:[~2002-08-20 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-20 11:27 Keith Seitz [this message]
2002-08-20 12:55 ` Michael Snyder
2002-08-20 13:03 ` Keith Seitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0208201122180.1421-100000@valrhona.uglyboxes.com \
--to=keiths@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox