Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Denis Joseph Barrow" <DJBARROW@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: New gdb 31 & 64 bit patches for S/390
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF52CDD1AF.3BB91388-ONC1256AA9.003124BC@de.ibm.com> (raw)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1921 bytes --]

Hi Andrew,
>> No wonder you lost the HP maintainer
> I don't understand what you mean here.


Ohhhh I'm crossing the politically correct line again, where's the valium.

What I meant you made probably him jump through so many hoops as you are
making me you probably just pissed the guy off
so he went looking for another job ( he probably is back programming
windows now ).

I'll readily admit to being a hothead ( sometimes justifiably so ).

Some of the stuff I'm being asked to do by you has very little bearing on
code quality bugwise just Andrew's
coding style vs my own.

If anything the code quality may be deteriorating owing to being asked to
move code around so much & possibly being tired of retesting it,
I currently have 4 versions of the code to support the post 5.0 32 & 64 bit
patches the 5.0 32 & 64 bit patches & a lot of other work to do
besides & probably falling back on it, when enthuasism is low my
productivity deteriorates badly, this crap is pissing me off.
 I will remove the non multi arch definitions when I don't have to support
gdb-5.0.

The last patch I posted you took 5 months to come back with comments, Alan
Cox usually takes 30 minutes & he a very busy man
Being overbearing may be stifling gdb.

We did our first 31 bit gdb drop 20 months ago.
Even redhat has a experimental 64 bit drop for the last 6 months & it still
isn't gnu.org the repository .



D.J. Barrow Gnu/Linux for S/390 kernel developer
eMail: djbarrow@de.ibm.com,barrow_dj@yahoo.com
Phone: +49-(0)7031-16-2583
IBM Germany Lab, Schönaicherstr. 220, 71032 Böblingen


Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> on 15.08.2001 07:51:38

Please respond to Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>

To:   Denis Joseph Barrow/Germany/Contr/IBM@IBMDE
cc:   ac131313@cygnus.com
Subject:  Re: New gdb 31 & 64 bit patches for S/390



> No wonder you lost the HP maintainer.

I don't understand what you mean here.

     Andrew






             reply	other threads:[~2001-08-15  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-15  2:22 Denis Joseph Barrow [this message]
2001-08-15  9:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-08-15  9:54 ` Andrew Cagney
     [not found] <OFEFF0AD94.761C34C1-ONC1256AB6.005503EE@de.ibm.com>
2001-08-28 16:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-09-05 21:45   ` Andrew Cagney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-13  9:47 Denis Joseph Barrow
2001-08-13  3:06 Denis Joseph Barrow
2001-08-13  9:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-06  2:31 Denis Joseph Barrow
2001-07-05 10:24 Denis Joseph Barrow
2001-07-05 12:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-08  0:53   ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-07-08 19:23     ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-05  9:19 Denis Joseph Barrow
2001-07-05 12:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-05  9:15 Denis Joseph Barrow
2001-07-05  5:04 Denis Joseph Barrow
2001-07-05  3:57 Denis Joseph Barrow
2001-07-05 10:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-05 10:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-05  3:12 Denis Joseph Barrow
2001-06-18  3:32 DJBARROW
     [not found] <C1256A02.00573066.00@d12mta09.de.ibm.com>
2001-03-01 10:39 ` Nick Clifton
2001-03-01  2:50 DJBARROW
2001-03-01 10:37 ` Nick Clifton
2001-02-27 12:39 DJBARROW
2001-02-28 16:13 ` Nick Clifton
2001-06-15  9:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-06-15 11:46   ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-06-15 12:22     ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-04 11:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-04 21:02 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-04 21:02 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-04 21:02 ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OF52CDD1AF.3BB91388-ONC1256AA9.003124BC@de.ibm.com \
    --to=djbarrow@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox