Re: New gdb 31 & 64 bit patches for S/390

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>]

Hello,

I intend checking in the attatched (diff) patch.  Before doing it 
though, is the s390 really a 31 bit architecture?

For reference I've also included the original diff and ChangeLog.

	Andrew
From ac131313@cygnus.com Fri Jun 15 09:56:00 2001
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: DJBARROW@de.ibm.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com, s390-patches@gnu.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ARENZ@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: New gdb 31 & 64 bit patches for S/390
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:56:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B2A3E33.3000906@cygnus.com>
References: <C1256A00.006F3FCE.00@d12mta09.de.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00297.html
Content-length: 540

> The only thing I'm aware of which isn't working properly
> is gdb /boot/vmlinux /proc/kcore
> when compiled for multiarch
> 
> This is because the bfd stuff returns
> bfd_arch_unknown
> 
> & set_gdbarch_from_file complains because gdbarch_update_p can't fix up
> this,
>  this however is quite normal for the /proc/kcore file even when compiled
> without multi-arch,
> the code works fine when compiled without multi-arch.


I believe this was a bug in the logic that selected the current 
architecture and was recently fixed.

	Andrew