From: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA/commit+doco 2/2] Windows x64 SEH unwinder.
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F8B3C1F4-B032-4838-A82A-7A0C4C2B5303@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83pq1egx45.fsf@gnu.org>
On Jan 9, 2013, at 5:05 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:53:01 +0400
>>
>> This is the main part of the patch series, which actually
>> adds the unwinder.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> One element worth mentioning, perhaps, is the fact that we prepend
>> the unwinder, and the sniffer is the default_frame_sniffer which
>> always returns 1 (absence of SEH info is normal and means it is
>> a leaf function). This effectively means that all other unwinders
>> effectively get shunted. And in particular, I do not think that
>> the DWARF unwinder will kick in even if DWARF unwind info is found.
>>
>> The problem is that we want to be ahead of the default amd64-tdep
>> unwinders, which is kind of a last-resort unwinder doing a good
>> job under limited situations only. We'd like to be behind the DWARF
>> unwinder if we could, but I don't think there is a way to ensure
>> that yet.
>>
>> In practice, this shouldn't be a problem, since this unwinder
>> has been very reliable for us so far. But it does assume that
>> the compiler is recent enough to generate native SEH data which,
>> for GCC, means GCC 4.7 (I have been told). On the other hand,
>> it looks like the first GCC release to support x64-windows was
>> GCC 4.6.
>>
>> I don't really see a real way of supporting both old and new versions
>> of GCC, unless we have a way of more finely ordering the unwinders.
>> Worse case scenario, we stop supporting code generated by GCC 4.6.
>> Or an alternative option is to provide a setting to disable this
>> unwinder.
>
> I'm confused: is this change only for 64-bit Windows programs?
Yes.
> If
> not, what GCC versions will this support for debugging 32-bit
> executables?
>
>> diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
>> index 3451505..d981ac5 100644
>> --- a/gdb/NEWS
>> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
>> @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ show print type typedefs
>> feature to be enabled. For more information, see:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo
>>
>> +* GDB can now use Windows x64 unwinding data.
>> +
>
> This is OK to go in, but it seems to imply that only 64-bit
> executables are affected. What would it take to do the same on 32-bit
> Windows?
There is no such thing as unwind info for SEH on windows 32-bit.
Tristan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-09 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-09 10:53 Add Windows x64 SEH unwinder (take 2) Joel Brobecker
2013-01-09 10:53 ` [RFA/commit+NEWS 1/2] Add command set/show debug unwind Joel Brobecker
2013-01-09 12:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-09 18:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-01-09 15:14 ` Tom Tromey
2013-01-09 16:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-09 10:53 ` [RFA/commit+doco 2/2] Windows x64 SEH unwinder Joel Brobecker
2013-01-09 15:52 ` Pedro Alves
2013-01-09 16:28 ` Tristan Gingold
2013-01-09 17:10 ` Pedro Alves
2013-01-09 17:53 ` Tom Tromey
2013-01-09 19:11 ` Pedro Alves
2013-01-09 20:07 ` Tristan Gingold
2013-01-10 16:24 ` Pedro Alves
2013-01-11 8:04 ` Tristan Gingold
2013-07-08 10:55 ` [RFA] Windows x64 SEH unwinder (v2) Tristan Gingold
2013-07-26 15:22 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-19 13:59 ` Tristan Gingold
2013-08-19 14:13 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-22 9:33 ` [PATCH v3] Windows x64 SEH unwinder Tristan Gingold
2013-08-22 15:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-22 15:26 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-22 15:41 ` Tristan Gingold
2013-08-22 16:15 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-23 6:54 ` Tristan Gingold
2013-08-27 17:45 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 9:28 ` Tristan Gingold
2013-01-09 16:06 ` [RFA/commit+doco 2/2] " Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-09 16:29 ` Tristan Gingold [this message]
2013-01-09 11:05 ` Add Windows x64 SEH unwinder (take 2) Pedro Alves
2013-01-09 11:11 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F8B3C1F4-B032-4838-A82A-7A0C4C2B5303@adacore.com \
--to=gingold@adacore.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox