From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, hal9000ed2k@gmail.com, dje@google.com,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com,
brobecker@adacore.com, drow@false.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename)
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 08:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1RYCLT-0000ap-OY@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3obvll9hr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:40:16 -0700)
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, hal9000ed2k@gmail.com,
> dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com,
> brobecker@adacore.com, drow@false.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:40:16 -0700
>
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> Eli> Then maybe "as-recorded"? Meaning that this is how the compiler
> Eli> recorded the file name in the debug info?
>
> Works for me.
Thanks for the feedback. However, I still would like to know whether
my guess regarding the current default, viz.:
I think I know the answer. We show by default whatever the compiler
saw on its command line when it compiled the source file. E.g., if
the command was
gcc -c ... /foo/bar/baz.c
then GDB will show "/foo/bar/baz.c", but if the compilation command
was
gcc -c ... baz.c
then GDB will show "baz.c".
is correct. If this is correct, then we will need an additional
setting of the new option. Or maybe I misunderstand, and the
consensus here is to _rename_ "full" to "as-recorded" and otherwise
leave the implementation intact?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-07 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-26 20:00 iam ahal
2011-06-26 20:49 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-06-27 16:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-06-27 16:18 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-06-28 20:08 ` Tom Tromey
2011-06-28 22:36 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-07-03 18:12 ` iam ahal
2011-07-03 21:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-04 11:26 ` iam ahal
2011-07-04 12:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-04 21:47 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-07-05 4:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-19 14:43 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-05 8:38 ` iam ahal
2011-07-19 14:19 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-17 19:24 ` iam ahal
2011-07-19 13:28 ` iam ahal
2011-07-19 17:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-24 21:12 ` iam ahal
2011-07-26 14:17 ` iam ahal
2011-07-28 15:34 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-28 15:57 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-28 16:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-07-28 17:39 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-28 17:51 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-29 12:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-07-29 12:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-08-02 19:41 ` iam ahal
2011-08-03 17:45 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-30 19:52 ` iam ahal
2011-11-02 19:06 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-02 22:53 ` Doug Evans
2011-12-04 15:52 ` iam ahal
2011-12-04 16:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-04 18:41 ` iam ahal
2011-12-04 19:01 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-04 19:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-04 21:00 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 3:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-05 5:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-06 13:03 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-06 14:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-06 18:00 ` Doug Evans
2011-12-06 20:45 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-07 8:00 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2012-03-10 20:15 ` iam ahal
2012-03-11 1:22 ` asmwarrior
2012-03-12 13:10 ` iam ahal
2012-03-14 16:11 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-14 16:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-14 17:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-03-15 22:46 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-18 18:30 ` iam ahal
2012-03-18 18:35 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-04-06 14:22 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-18 20:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-03-25 19:27 ` iam ahal
2012-03-25 19:31 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-25 21:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-06 12:50 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-06 20:40 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-06 23:02 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-29 13:35 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-01 18:04 ` Tom Tromey
2011-06-29 10:09 ` Andrew Burgess
2011-06-29 16:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-07-03 18:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2011-06-28 20:08 ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-09 15:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1RYCLT-0000ap-OY@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=hal9000ed2k@gmail.com \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox