From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-85901-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6146 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2011 07:55:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 6134 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2011 07:55:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:55:18 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1RYCLT-0000ap-OY; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:55:15 -0500
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 08:00:00 -0000
Message-Id: <E1RYCLT-0000ap-OY@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
CC: pedro@codesourcery.com, hal9000ed2k@gmail.com, dje@google.com,	gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com,	brobecker@adacore.com, drow@false.org,	jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
In-reply-to: <m3obvll9hr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (message from Tom Tromey on	Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:40:16 -0700)
Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename)
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <BANLkTinD+9_Mkug8o2VhZ03L6XSriL_RKQ@mail.gmail.com>	<83fwgzbrp9.fsf@gnu.org> <E1RXQvX-00045Q-Hk@fencepost.gnu.org>	<201112061249.47758.pedro@codesourcery.com>	<E1RXugC-0005av-VR@fencepost.gnu.org> <m3obvll9hr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, hal9000ed2k@gmail.com,
>         dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com,
>         brobecker@adacore.com, drow@false.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:40:16 -0700
> 
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> Eli> Then maybe "as-recorded"?  Meaning that this is how the compiler
> Eli> recorded the file name in the debug info?
> 
> Works for me.

Thanks for the feedback.  However, I still would like to know whether
my guess regarding the current default, viz.:

  I think I know the answer.  We show by default whatever the compiler
  saw on its command line when it compiled the source file.  E.g., if
  the command was

    gcc -c ... /foo/bar/baz.c

  then GDB will show "/foo/bar/baz.c", but if the compilation command
  was

    gcc -c ... baz.c

  then GDB will show "baz.c".

is correct.  If this is correct, then we will need an additional
setting of the new option.  Or maybe I misunderstand, and the
consensus here is to _rename_ "full" to "as-recorded" and otherwise
leave the implementation intact?