From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Improve testsuite for poor expect behavior
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1MHIkp-0006kk-V9@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090617193938.GB14549@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:39:38 -0700)
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:39:38 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> > Did someone check that switching it to binary will not interfere with
> > Emacs 23 GDB interface on Windows?
>
> Not sure about your specific question, but the piece I quoted only
> unbuffers stdout and stderr
Yes, I know that. However, Emacs on Windows jumps through the hoops
to emulate Posix pipe semantics with Windows pipes, and then the way
Emacs reads input from subprocesses has its own quirks (due to the
need to auto-detect multibyte non-ASCII characters in pipe reads,
where there are no guarantees that a multibyte character will not be
broken in its middle). So before we unconditionally do what you'd
like, I would suggest that someone checks that GUD in Emacs 23 is not
broken by these changes, however innocent they might be when GDB runs
on a true console.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-18 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 23:00 Pierre Muller
2009-06-13 14:52 ` Doug Evans
2009-06-13 15:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-13 20:29 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-13 23:55 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2009-06-14 0:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-15 7:23 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-16 14:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-16 23:29 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-17 13:36 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2009-06-17 14:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-17 17:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-17 19:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-18 14:38 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2009-06-18 14:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-18 15:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-18 15:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-18 15:58 ` Samuel Bronson
2009-06-18 23:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-17 17:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-17 20:17 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-17 21:00 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-18 14:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-18 15:57 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-18 16:08 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-18 23:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-18 16:19 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-17 21:56 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-18 14:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-17 22:39 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-17 22:43 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2009-06-17 22:54 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-17 23:21 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2009-06-17 23:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-18 6:31 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-06-23 18:14 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1MHIkp-0006kk-V9@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox