* gdb March 2001 archive
@ 2001-03-27 2:55 RDBrown
2001-03-27 8:04 ` Kevin Buettner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: RDBrown @ 2001-03-27 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb, gdb-patches
The gdb Mar 2001 archive hasn't moved past March 21 - is the mail getting
through or is it just the archive?
What do you want loaded on the testresults page?
gdb/testsuite/gdb.log or gdb/testsuite/gdb.sum?
Building from the 0324 snapshot on alpha-dec-osf4.0e and i586-sco-sysv5uw7.1.0
somewhat required the following patch - which should be done with autoconf.
Both provide NSIG but only if _XOPEN_SOURCE etc are undefined.
(Both using gcc-2.95.2)
On alpha-dec-osf4.0e the link failed missing `in_solib_dynsym_resolve_code'.
/usr/bin/ld:
Unresolved:
in_solib_dynsym_resolve_code
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
--- expect/exp_trap.c.orig Tue Mar 27 00:17:00 2001
+++ expect/exp_trap.c Mon Mar 26 13:18:59 2001
@@ -22,6 +22,12 @@
#ifndef NSIG
#ifdef _NSIG
#define NSIG _NSIG
+#else
+#ifdef __osf__ /* alpha-dec-osf4.0e workaround */
+#define NSIG 49
+#else /* i586-sco-sysv5uw7.1.0 workaround */
+#define NSIG 35
+#endif
#endif
#endif
--- expect/exp_command.c.orig Tue Mar 27 00:17:15 2001
+++ expect/exp_command.c Mon Mar 26 13:18:50 2001
@@ -53,6 +53,12 @@
#ifndef NSIG
#ifdef _NSIG
#define NSIG _NSIG
+#else
+#ifdef __osf__ /* alpha-dec-osf4.0e workaround */
+#define NSIG 49
+#else /* i586-sco-sysv5uw7.1.0 workaround */
+#define NSIG 35
+#endif
#endif
#endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: gdb March 2001 archive
2001-03-27 2:55 gdb March 2001 archive RDBrown
@ 2001-03-27 8:04 ` Kevin Buettner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Buettner @ 2001-03-27 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: RDBrown, RodneyBrown, gdb, gdb-patches
On Mar 27, 8:57pm, RDBrown@mira.net wrote:
> Building from the 0324 snapshot on alpha-dec-osf4.0e and i586-sco-sysv5uw7.1.0
> somewhat required the following patch - which should be done with autoconf.
> Both provide NSIG but only if _XOPEN_SOURCE etc are undefined.
> (Both using gcc-2.95.2)
[...]
> --- expect/exp_trap.c.orig Tue Mar 27 00:17:00 2001
> +++ expect/exp_trap.c Mon Mar 26 13:18:59 2001
> @@ -22,6 +22,12 @@
> #ifndef NSIG
> #ifdef _NSIG
> #define NSIG _NSIG
> +#else
> +#ifdef __osf__ /* alpha-dec-osf4.0e workaround */
> +#define NSIG 49
> +#else /* i586-sco-sysv5uw7.1.0 workaround */
> +#define NSIG 35
> +#endif
> #endif
> #endif
I've been getting past this problem by just undefining _XOPEN_SOURCE
in the resulting expect_cf.h file (after running configure). But I
agree that something ought to be done in the configury. (I'd prefer
to not add defines for NSIG to the sources.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-03-27 8:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-03-27 2:55 gdb March 2001 archive RDBrown
2001-03-27 8:04 ` Kevin Buettner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox