From: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Python Finish Breakpoints
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPftXUKD3Oy_jbZaUFDTbGt3w9XqrSq5O2d_cv5ZGrUyeREx7g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPftXUJwtGJhqFyfX6LVK87QH2xeLkvv5kx=yaEnYJMv0YR_rw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Kevin> py-breakpoint.c::gdbpy_should_stop is executed _before_ we have the
> Kevin> chance to save the stop_registers, used to compute the return value
> Kevin> (in infrun.c::normal_stop).
> Kevin> (the problem existed since the beginning, but I never faced it before)
>
> Kevin> I've updated the function infcmd.c::get_return_value to take this
> Kevin> situation into account, using the current registers if the
> Kevin> 'stop_registers' are not set, based on what is done in
> Kevin> infrun.c::normal_stop:
>
> This approach seems reasonable to me but I am not sure whether or not it
> is really ok. Most times I've tried to change infrun, I've been burned.
I'm not sure what to do here,
I don't change the value of the global variable "stop_registers" so
if shouldn't affect more than my code,
but it also depends of the side effects of
> regcache_dup (get_current_regcache ())
which is now triggered 'slightly' before when it used to be ...
> Kevin> I think that I handle that in the following lines:
> Kevin> + if (except.reason < 0
> Kevin> + || !self_bpfinish->return_type || !self_bpfinish->function_type)
>
> The problem is that Python errors are sticky. So, if one occurs one
> must either pass it upward (having the current function fail), or clear
> it somehow. It isn't ok to ignore them, call other Python functions,
> and then later check.
> Kevin> + /* Remember only non-VOID return types. */
> Kevin> + if (TYPE_CODE (ret_type) != TYPE_CODE_VOID)
> Kevin> + {
> Kevin> + self_bpfinish->return_type = type_to_type_object (ret_type);
> Kevin> + self_bpfinish->function_type =
> Kevin> + type_to_type_object (SYMBOL_TYPE (function));
>
> As discussed above, you need to check for errors immediately after each
> call, and DTRT. You can ignore them with PyErr_Clear.
ok, I didn't know this point, so I've rewritten this to
unconditionally clear the Py exception after these two calls, and then
test against NULL as before.
> Kevin> I think I wrote a word about that in the previous mail, anyway, my
> Kevin> feeling was that I don't want to abort the FinishBreakpoint creation
> Kevin> just because of a return value not computable, so I currently nullify
> Kevin> these fields and silently disable return value computation. I can't
> Kevin> see any straightforward way to notify Python about that,
> Kevin> warning/exceptions won't suite ... otherwise, I could expose the
> Kevin> return_type to the Python interface, this way, one could check that
> Kevin> it's not None and now if GDB will/might be able to compute the return
> Kevin> value when the FinishBP is hit
>
> Ok, this makes sense to me.
>
> Tom> bpfinishpy_detect_out_scope_cb still acquires the GIL (via
> Tom> ensure_python_env), but should not.
>
> Kevin> I'm not exactly sure what was you concern here, as far as I
> Kevin> understand, the GIL was acquired in bpfinishpy_handle_stop, so it
> Kevin> should have no effect in detect_out_scope_cb. So I've removed it from
> Kevin> detect_out_scope_cb as it was useless.
>
> I think it is inefficient to recursively acquire the GIL.
right, the doc doesn't say anything about the efficiency of GIL
acquisition, so let's
assume you're right!
> Kevin> +@defun FinishBreakpoint.__init__ (@r{[}frame@r{]} @r{[}, internal@r{]})
> Kevin> +Create a finish breakpoint at the return address of the @code{gdb.Frame}
> Kevin> +object @var{frame} (or @code{gdb.selected_frame()} is not provided).
>
> I think it should read something like:
>
> Create a finish breakpoint at the return address of the @code{gdb.Frame}
> object @var{frame}. If @var{frame} is not provided, this defaults to
> the newest frame.
ok for the sentence construction,
> I think it is better to default to the newest frame, because the
> selected frame is more of a user-interface thing, and I think code
> wanting this should explicitly use it.
My thought when I chose to use 'selected_frame' was to match the
behavior of the CLI finish command. When you type it, you finish the
'selected' frame, and not the newest one.
In my use-cases, I always have gdb.selected_frame == gdb.newest_frame,
so I don't have a strong preference. I've switch the code/doc to
newest_frame.
> Kevin> +type is @code{VOID}
>
> I think just @code{void} is better.
sure
> Kevin> + /* If stop_registers where not saved, use the current registers. */
>
> s/where/were/
fixed
> Kevin> + if (cleanup)
> Kevin> + do_cleanups (cleanup);
>
> This is a gdb anti-pattern. A call to make_cleanup can return NULL in
> some scenarios.
>
> It is better to install a null cleanup and then unconditionally call
> do_cleanups.
ok, didn't know it either, fixed with the null cleanup
> Kevin> + /* Default to gdb.selected_frame if necessary. */
> Kevin> + if (!frame_obj)
> Kevin> + frame_obj = gdbpy_selected_frame (NULL, NULL);
>
> gdbpy_newest_frame
>
> I don't think there is a decref for the frame_obj along this path.
I've changed it to:
if (!frame_obj)
frame_obj = gdbpy_newest_frame (NULL, NULL);
else
Py_INCREF (frame_obj);
frame = frame_object_to_frame_info (frame_obj);
Py_DECREF (frame_obj);
which looks clearer to me than setting a flag, or testing the kwargs
for the "frame" keyword
> Kevin> + PyErr_SetString (PyExc_ValueError,
> Kevin> + _("\"FinishBreakpoint\" not meaningful in the outermost frame."));
>
> Kevin> + PyErr_SetString (PyExc_ValueError,
> Kevin> + _("\"FinishBreakpoint\" cannot be set on a dummy frame."));
>
> Indentation.
>
> Kevin> + PyErr_SetString (PyExc_ValueError,
> Kevin> + _("Invalid ID for the `frame' object."));
>
> Indentation.
These 3 lines where right-justified to column 79, I've split them.
> Kevin> +static void
> Kevin> +bpfinishpy_out_of_scope (struct finish_breakpoint_object *bpfinish_obj)
> Kevin> +{
> [...]
> Kevin> + TRY_CATCH (except, RETURN_MASK_ALL)
> Kevin> + {
> Kevin> + delete_breakpoint (bpfinish_obj->py_bp.bp);
> Kevin> + }
> Kevin> + if (except.reason < 0)
> Kevin> + {
> Kevin> + gdbpy_convert_exception (except);
> Kevin> + gdbpy_print_stack ();
> Kevin> + }
>
> I probably asked you to add this, but if bpfinishpy_out_of_scope can
> only be called in one spot:
>
> Kevin> + TRY_CATCH (except, RETURN_MASK_ALL)
> Kevin> + {
> Kevin> + if (b->pspace == current_inferior ()->pspace
> Kevin> + && (!target_has_registers
> Kevin> + || frame_find_by_id (b->frame_id) == NULL))
> Kevin> + {
> Kevin> + bpfinishpy_out_of_scope (finish_bp);
> Kevin> + }
> Kevin> + }
> Kevin> + if (except.reason < 0)
> Kevin> + {
> Kevin> + gdbpy_convert_exception (except);
> Kevin> + gdbpy_print_stack ();
> Kevin> + }
>
> ... then the TRY_CATCH in bpfinishpy_out_of_scope is not needed.
right
> Kevin> + struct cleanup *cleanup = ensure_python_env (target_gdbarch,
> Kevin> + current_language);
>
> Indentation.
fixed
There is no regression against the current tree (2011-11-18)
Thanks,
Kevin
2011-11-18 Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@st.com>
Introduce gdb.FinishBreakpoint in Python
* Makefile.in (SUBDIR_PYTHON_OBS): Add py-finishbreakpoint.o.
(SUBDIR_PYTHON_SRCS): Add python/py-finishbreakpoint.c.
Add build rule for this file.
* infcmd.c (print_return_value): Split to create get_return_value.
(get_return_value): New function based on print_return_value. Handle
case where stop_registers are not set.
* inferior.h (get_return_value): New prototype.
* python/py-breakpoint.c (bppy_pending_object): Make non-static.
(gdbpy_breakpoint_created): Set is_py_finish_bp is necessary.
(struct breakpoint_object): Move to python-internal.h
(BPPY_REQUIRE_VALID): Likewise.
(BPPY_SET_REQUIRE_VALID): Likewise.
(gdbpy_breakpoint_created): Initialize is_finish_bp.
(gdbpy_should_stop): Add pre/post hooks before/after calling stop
method.
* python/python-internal.h (breakpoint_object_type): Add as extern.
(bppy_pending_object): Likewise.
(typedef struct breakpoint_object) Removed.
(struct breakpoint_object): Moved from py-breakpoint.c.
Add field is_finish_bp.
(BPPY_REQUIRE_VALID): Moved from py-breakpoint.c.
(BPPY_SET_REQUIRE_VALID): Likewise.
(frame_object_to_frame_info): New prototype.
(gdbpy_initialize_finishbreakpoints): New prototype.
(bpfinishpy_is_finish_bp): Likewise.
(bpfinishpy_pre_stop_hook): Likewise.
(bpfinishpy_post_stop_hook): Likewise.
* python/py-finishbreakpoint.c: New file.
* python/py-frame.c(frame_object_to_frame_info): Make non-static and
accept PyObject instead of frame_object.
(frapy_is_valid): Don't cast to frame_object.
(frapy_name): Likewise.
(frapy_type): Likewise.
(frapy_unwind_stop_reason): Likewise.
(frapy_pc): Likewise.
(frapy_block): Likewise.
(frapy_function): Likewise.
(frapy_older): Likewise.
(frapy_newer): Likewise.
(frapy_find_sal): Likewise.
(frapy_read_var): Likewise.
(frapy_select): Likewise.
* python/python.c (gdbpy_is_stopped_at_finish_bp): New noop function.
(_initialize_python): Add gdbpy_initialize_finishbreakpoints.
* python/python.h: Include breakpoint.h
(gdbpy_is_stopped_at_finish_bp): New prototype.
doc/
* gdb.texinfo (Finish Breakpoints in Python): New subsection.
(Python API): Add menu entry for Finish Breakpoints.
testsuite/
* gdb.python/py-breakpoint.exp (mult_line): Define and use variable
instead of line number.
* gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.c: New file.
* gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.exp: New file.
* gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.py: New file.
* gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint2.cc: New file.
* gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint2.exp: New file.
* gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint2.py: New file.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-24 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BANLkTim+YH64zkWvdz2_kVUUj=AJ7v4LKw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=gtHzWzXOJzB+a19=jkfk1hGwQBg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTikVdqbMqjguTV8ct0TWiBDhHGYtLg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-11 7:44 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-05-11 10:31 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-05-11 11:29 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-05-12 10:38 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-05-12 10:50 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-05-12 11:29 ` Kevin Pouget
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=Eu-5B4YyhP2rGdQXgXbBN-EmLKA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTikt2hEUcXkGVH44NaUcwiF1SGdMaw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=UpgogckTD5MZsW+PC5d2F8X-+jA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTi==bj50mZgFKq_qA-+3-2CQA3tBVw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTimmYEmvKT_984jYEVZnA5RGFpEgNw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-19 16:21 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-24 12:51 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-05-27 20:30 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-30 9:29 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-13 14:34 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-20 20:12 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-20 20:58 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-21 8:15 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-24 11:43 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-24 13:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-24 14:30 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-24 17:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-24 15:31 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-24 16:27 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-10-25 11:05 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-25 11:37 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-10-25 12:22 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-28 8:33 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-28 20:51 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-02 14:44 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-11-04 14:25 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-11-04 21:04 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-09 14:10 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-11-16 10:53 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-11-17 17:49 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-17 17:48 ` Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <CAPftXUJwtGJhqFyfX6LVK87QH2xeLkvv5kx=yaEnYJMv0YR_rw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-24 8:27 ` Kevin Pouget [this message]
2011-11-30 16:02 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-02 21:49 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-05 9:29 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-06 21:18 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-07 13:35 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-08 15:30 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-08 16:10 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-08 18:08 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-09 9:53 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-18 19:22 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-20 20:55 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-20 20:58 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-21 7:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-21 17:13 ` Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <CAPftXUKXh9ekZ2kiwQ=5zbrjst+9VH9-eZk8h+Z-9SpQ1WqdLw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAPftXULQFggY3Nz2byC0fMZA1sg4Nymp3hAhe8aSuLNG4cauFg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAPftXUJALHd=-fajVwgowqfCDfXO6JMxSkorWD6CQArsg-PedQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAPftXULKC8gp3L87+PZEF3dj3crv9bh-uzZpRiYKjqEw_xyptQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-12-27 4:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-27 9:40 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-27 12:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-27 9:34 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-24 23:56 ` [patch] Fix gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.exp new FAIL on x86_64-m32 [Re: [RFC] Python Finish Breakpoints] Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-27 11:13 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-27 21:39 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-04 17:45 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-04 17:58 ` [commit 7.4] " Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-04 18:10 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-26 11:28 ` [patch] Fix remote.c crash on gdbserver close (+fix py-finish-breakpoint.exp for gdbserver) " Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-27 23:30 ` [patch] Fix remote.c crash on gdbserver close (+fix py-finish-breakpoint.exp for gdbserver) [rediff] Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-02 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-02 19:49 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-19 16:24 ` Call target_close after unpushing, not before (was: Re: [patch] Fix remote.c crash on gdbserver close (+fix py-finish-breakpoint.exp for gdbserver)) Pedro Alves
2012-01-19 16:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-19 16:37 ` Call target_close after unpushing, not before Pedro Alves
2012-01-19 16:53 ` [commit] Re: Call target_close after unpushing, not before (was: Re: [patch] Fix remote.c crash on gdbserver close (+fix py-finish-breakpoint.exp for gdbserver)) Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-04 14:49 ` [RFC] Python Finish Breakpoints Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-04 15:24 ` Kevin Pouget
2012-01-04 16:29 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-04 16:42 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-04 16:40 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-04 17:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-09 9:21 ` Kevin Pouget
2012-01-27 17:01 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-28 19:26 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPftXUKD3Oy_jbZaUFDTbGt3w9XqrSq5O2d_cv5ZGrUyeREx7g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kevin.pouget@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox