Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@mentor.com>,
	gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Eliminate UNSUPPORTED_ERROR.
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP9bCMTk4RzQnte3Nq57TpzwdkxWA0hXOPaS9u0ST9oP+k2AxA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A8BA3D.9020403@redhat.com>

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/11/2013 04:33 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
>>> > -         /* Should we fallback to ye olde GDB script mode?  */
>>> > -         if (script_ext_mode == script_ext_soft
>>> > -             && e.reason == RETURN_ERROR && e.error == UNSUPPORTED_ERROR)
>>> > -           {
>>> > -             fseek (stream, 0, SEEK_SET);
>>> > -             script_from_file (stream, (char*) file);
>>> > -           }
>>> > -         else
>>> > -           {
>>> > -             /* Nope, just punt.  */
>>> > -             throw_exception (e);
>>> > -           }
>>> > +         /* Fallback to GDB script mode.  */
>>> > +         fseek (stream, 0, SEEK_SET);
>>> > +         script_from_file (stream, (char*) file);
>> Remove the fseek and cast.
>
> Hmm, indeed the fseek doesn't look necessary.  Will do.  However,
> that makes me wonder whether I'm missing something, as it doesn't
> look necessary before my patch either.  Was it ever really
> needed?

I think I added it to be extra conservative in case
source_python_script happened to read from the file.
[I know it normally wouldn't read and then throw an UNSUPPORTED_ERROR,
but I'm guessing I didn't want this code to assume that.]

Now that we're not even calling source_python_script the need is gone.

 I see you added it (and the unnecessary cast too ;-) ) in:
>   https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00110.html
> but I can't tell why.

script_from_file was changed to take a const char *arg the prior week.
Presumably I just didn't update that part of the patch.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-12  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-21 10:30 [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet Hui Zhu
2013-10-21 15:37 ` Pedro Alves
2013-11-28 10:56   ` Hui Zhu
2013-11-28 17:38     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-11-29  9:41       ` Hui Zhu
2013-11-29 15:27     ` [pushed] Plug target side conditions and commands leaks (was: Re: [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet) Pedro Alves
2013-11-29 16:05     ` [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet Pedro Alves
2013-12-02 12:45       ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-02 14:38         ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-03  4:50           ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-03  4:54             ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-06 19:29             ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-08  5:19               ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-08  8:34                 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-08 14:18                   ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-09 19:48                 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-09 21:07                   ` Doug Evans
2013-12-10 17:34                     ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-10 18:14                       ` [PATCH] Eliminate UNSUPPORTED_ERROR Pedro Alves
2013-12-11 16:33                         ` Doug Evans
2013-12-11 19:17                           ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-12  4:23                             ` Doug Evans [this message]
2013-12-12 10:23                               ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-11 16:40                       ` [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet Doug Evans
2013-12-12 10:55                     ` breakpoint.c:insert_bp_location: Constify local. (was: Re: [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet) Pedro Alves
2013-12-12 12:55                     ` [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet Pedro Alves
2014-01-09 18:36                       ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAP9bCMTk4RzQnte3Nq57TpzwdkxWA0hXOPaS9u0ST9oP+k2AxA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xdje42@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hui_zhu@mentor.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox