From: Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v3] [AArch64] Support tagged pointer
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 01:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANW4E-2Ksmyq7_Z3HAUXjS3=GrHUnS9WA17oLni4Uw1fjRSMtQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <061e956c-72a7-2c2e-512b-3dfe42881818@redhat.com>
On 11 April 2018 at 23:27, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/11/2018 12:59 PM, Omair Javaid wrote:
>
> > Yes I can submit a patch that enables set_gdbarch_significant_addr_bit
> for aarch64-linux-tdep only.
> >
> > But a point to discuss here is the use-case where some people use
> *-linux-gdb for debugging seamlessly between kernel and user-space.
> >
> > There can be ways we can distinguish between user/kernel address space
> and clear or set top byte of the address even in case of linux targets.
> >
> > Does this sound something we should do?
>
> Yeah, why not.
>
> What are the pending kernel debugging patches using to distinguish
> userspace and kernel debugging modes? Off hand, I'd think we'd want to
> make those separate ABIs / osabis / gdbarchs.
>
Sorry for late reply on this I am out of office this week.
I have given this a thought and I propose to do the following:
Turn on pointer tagging on OSABI (LINUX) by default.
Add commands set aarch64 pointer-tagging show/enable/disable.
Once LKD patches for aarch64/arm land in our need for this will
automatically be solved.
^ Does this make sense?
For Linux Kernel Debugging we have separate OSABI (LINUX_KERNEL). Patch
snippet from LKD patches by Phillip given below:
+static enum gdb_osabi
+s390_lk_osabi_sniffer (bfd *abfd)
+{
+ if (bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg-s390-prefix")
+ || bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, "__ksymtab"))
+ return GDB_OSABI_LINUX_KERNEL;
+
+ return GDB_OSABI_UNKNOWN;
+}
+
+extern initialize_file_ftype _initialize_s390_lk_tdep; /*
-Wmissing-prototypes */
+
+void
+_initialize_s390_lk_tdep (void)
+{
+ /* Hook us into the OSABI mechanism. */
+ gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_s390, bfd_mach_s390_64,
GDB_OSABI_LINUX_KERNEL,
+ s390_lk_init_abi_64);
+ /* Add OSABI sniffer. */
+ gdbarch_register_osabi_sniffer (bfd_arch_s390, bfd_target_elf_flavour,
+ s390_lk_osabi_sniffer);
+
+ /* Initialize the Linux kernel target descriptions. */
+ initialize_tdesc_s390x_cr_linux64 ();
+ initialize_tdesc_s390x_vxcr_linux64 ();
+}
Thanks,
> Pedro Alves
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-16 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-08 10:04 Yao Qi
2017-12-08 10:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] Adjust breakpoint address by clearing non-significant bits Yao Qi
2017-12-08 12:22 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-08 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] Clear non-significant bits of address on memory access Yao Qi
2017-12-08 12:22 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-08 15:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-08 15:36 ` Yao Qi
2017-12-19 13:50 ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-19 15:41 ` Yao Qi
2017-12-19 16:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-20 9:57 ` Yao Qi
2017-12-20 13:03 ` [pushed] Fix Cell/B.E. regression (Re: [PATCH 1/3] Clear non-significant bits of address on memory access) Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-20 13:59 ` Yao Qi
2017-12-08 10:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] Clear non-significant bits of address in watchpoint Yao Qi
2017-12-08 12:23 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-08 12:24 ` [PATCH 0/3 v3] [AArch64] Support tagged pointer Pedro Alves
2017-12-08 17:31 ` Yao Qi
2018-04-11 0:16 ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-11 0:37 ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-11 2:46 ` Simon Marchi
2018-04-11 10:14 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-11 11:13 ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-11 11:19 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-11 12:01 ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-11 18:27 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-16 1:36 ` Omair Javaid [this message]
2018-04-16 22:57 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-20 14:34 ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-20 16:13 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-23 7:50 ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-24 11:39 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-24 15:44 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-24 11:48 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-24 16:05 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-24 23:42 ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-25 0:09 ` Andrew Pinski
2018-04-25 8:04 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-26 8:11 ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-27 16:29 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-30 13:42 ` Omair Javaid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANW4E-2Ksmyq7_Z3HAUXjS3=GrHUnS9WA17oLni4Uw1fjRSMtQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=omair.javaid@linaro.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox