Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v3] [AArch64] Support tagged pointer
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 01:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANW4E-2Ksmyq7_Z3HAUXjS3=GrHUnS9WA17oLni4Uw1fjRSMtQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <061e956c-72a7-2c2e-512b-3dfe42881818@redhat.com>

On 11 April 2018 at 23:27, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 04/11/2018 12:59 PM, Omair Javaid wrote:
>
> > Yes I can submit a patch that enables set_gdbarch_significant_addr_bit
> for aarch64-linux-tdep only.
> >
> > But a point to discuss here is the use-case where some people use
> *-linux-gdb for debugging seamlessly between kernel and user-space.
> >
> > There can be ways we can distinguish between user/kernel address space
> and clear or set top byte of the address even in case of linux targets.
> >
> > Does this sound something we should do?
>
> Yeah, why not.
>
> What are the pending kernel debugging patches using to distinguish
> userspace and kernel debugging modes?  Off hand, I'd think we'd want to
> make those separate ABIs / osabis / gdbarchs.
>

Sorry for late reply on this I am out of office this week.

I have given this a thought and I propose to do the following:

Turn on pointer tagging on OSABI (LINUX) by default.

Add commands set aarch64 pointer-tagging show/enable/disable.

Once LKD patches for aarch64/arm land in our need for this will
automatically be solved.

^ Does this make sense?

For Linux Kernel Debugging we have separate OSABI (LINUX_KERNEL). Patch
snippet from LKD patches by Phillip given below:

+static enum gdb_osabi
+s390_lk_osabi_sniffer (bfd *abfd)
+{
+  if (bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".reg-s390-prefix")
+      || bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, "__ksymtab"))
+    return GDB_OSABI_LINUX_KERNEL;
+
+  return GDB_OSABI_UNKNOWN;
+}
+
+extern initialize_file_ftype _initialize_s390_lk_tdep; /*
-Wmissing-prototypes */
+
+void
+_initialize_s390_lk_tdep (void)
+{
+  /* Hook us into the OSABI mechanism.  */
+  gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_s390, bfd_mach_s390_64,
GDB_OSABI_LINUX_KERNEL,
+			  s390_lk_init_abi_64);
+  /* Add OSABI sniffer.  */
+  gdbarch_register_osabi_sniffer (bfd_arch_s390, bfd_target_elf_flavour,
+				  s390_lk_osabi_sniffer);
+
+  /* Initialize the Linux kernel target descriptions.  */
+  initialize_tdesc_s390x_cr_linux64 ();
+  initialize_tdesc_s390x_vxcr_linux64 ();
+}


Thanks,
> Pedro Alves
>


  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-16  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-08 10:04 Yao Qi
2017-12-08 10:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] Adjust breakpoint address by clearing non-significant bits Yao Qi
2017-12-08 12:22   ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-08 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] Clear non-significant bits of address on memory access Yao Qi
2017-12-08 12:22   ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-08 15:13     ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-08 15:36       ` Yao Qi
2017-12-19 13:50   ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-19 15:41     ` Yao Qi
2017-12-19 16:15       ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-20  9:57         ` Yao Qi
2017-12-20 13:03           ` [pushed] Fix Cell/B.E. regression (Re: [PATCH 1/3] Clear non-significant bits of address on memory access) Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-20 13:59             ` Yao Qi
2017-12-08 10:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] Clear non-significant bits of address in watchpoint Yao Qi
2017-12-08 12:23   ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-08 12:24 ` [PATCH 0/3 v3] [AArch64] Support tagged pointer Pedro Alves
2017-12-08 17:31 ` Yao Qi
2018-04-11  0:16   ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-11  0:37     ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-11  2:46       ` Simon Marchi
2018-04-11 10:14     ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-11 11:13       ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-11 11:19         ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-11 12:01           ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-11 18:27             ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-16  1:36               ` Omair Javaid [this message]
2018-04-16 22:57                 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-20 14:34                   ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-20 16:13                     ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-23  7:50                       ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-24 11:39                         ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-24 15:44                           ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-24 11:48                     ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-24 16:05                       ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-24 23:42                         ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-25  0:09                           ` Andrew Pinski
2018-04-25  8:04                           ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-26  8:11                             ` Omair Javaid
2018-04-27 16:29                               ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-30 13:42                                 ` Omair Javaid

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANW4E-2Ksmyq7_Z3HAUXjS3=GrHUnS9WA17oLni4Uw1fjRSMtQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=omair.javaid@linaro.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox