Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] 12843
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN9gPaFCORky68PHk8eOibsAodmgLBbXvb7JtjAy79zMD3qCUA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5C00D9.9060401@redhat.com>

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 12:46 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
>> My first reaction is against this, but I don't have a particularly good
>> explanation for that.  I will think about it.
>
> Is there actually any reason to require a flag? Couldn't we simply allow
> either a flag-based location _or_ a linespec, but not both, i.e.,
>
> -insert-break -file foo.c -function my_function
>
> OR
>
> -insert-break foo.c:my_function
>
> but not
>
> -insert-break -file foo.c my_function
>
> This would allow backward compatibility and new/better functionality.
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if IDEs adopted the flag-based version very quickly.

Heck, sometimes I'd use this from the command line if I could.

-- 
Thanks,
Daniel


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-30  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-25 21:59 Keith Seitz
2011-08-26 18:23 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-26 18:46   ` Keith Seitz
2011-08-26 19:07     ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-27  8:45       ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-08-27 13:17         ` asmwarrior
2011-08-29 19:18         ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-29  7:19       ` André Pönitz
2011-08-29 10:13         ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-29 12:06           ` Matt Rice
2011-08-29 12:15           ` André Pönitz
2011-08-29 13:53             ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-29 19:21             ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-30  8:19               ` André Pönitz
2011-08-30  9:21                 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-30 15:02                 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-30 16:34                   ` André Pönitz
2011-08-30 17:21                     ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-31  8:54                       ` André Pönitz
2011-08-29 19:46         ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-29 21:13           ` Keith Seitz
2011-08-30  2:35             ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2011-08-30 15:00             ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-30 17:24               ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-31 18:17   ` Keith Seitz
2011-08-31 18:23     ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-31 18:52     ` Tom Tromey
2011-09-02 16:04     ` asmwarrior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAN9gPaFCORky68PHk8eOibsAodmgLBbXvb7JtjAy79zMD3qCUA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=keiths@redhat.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox