From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: "André Pönitz" <andre.poenitz@nokia.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] 12843
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108291453.36039.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108291417.02082.andre.poenitz@nokia.com>
On Monday 29 August 2011 13:17:02, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Monday 29 August 2011 12:12:53 ext Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > Just using new flags for the parameters should do the trick in this case.
> >
> > Yeah, though I expect frontends to support letting the user specify
> > manually where to insert the breakpoint (say, with a popup dialog
> > where you write foo.exe:bar or something more complicated,
>
> It's the IDE's job to capture the user's intentions, i.e. either let the
> user provide explicit information about the kind of the breakpoint
> (file and line, function, 'on throw' etc) directly in the dialog, or do
> the kind of linespec parsing gdb currently does (which feels pretty
> unnatural for a "normal" GUI user who typically does not even want
> to know what kind of debugging "backend" is used.
I'd say the latter is arguable. Note I did not suggest that new switches
like --file and --line would be bad, I even agreed!
As long as the old form works, looks like everyone will be happy?
Thanks,
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-29 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-25 21:59 Keith Seitz
2011-08-26 18:23 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-26 18:46 ` Keith Seitz
2011-08-26 19:07 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-27 8:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-08-27 13:17 ` asmwarrior
2011-08-29 19:18 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-29 7:19 ` André Pönitz
2011-08-29 10:13 ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-29 12:06 ` Matt Rice
2011-08-29 12:15 ` André Pönitz
2011-08-29 13:53 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-08-29 19:21 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-30 8:19 ` André Pönitz
2011-08-30 9:21 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-30 15:02 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-30 16:34 ` André Pönitz
2011-08-30 17:21 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-31 8:54 ` André Pönitz
2011-08-29 19:46 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-29 21:13 ` Keith Seitz
2011-08-30 2:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2011-08-30 15:00 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-30 17:24 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-31 18:17 ` Keith Seitz
2011-08-31 18:23 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-31 18:52 ` Tom Tromey
2011-09-02 16:04 ` asmwarrior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108291453.36039.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=andre.poenitz@nokia.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox