Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep@gmail.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile.in includes linux-record.c to be common for all arch. (arm-reversible>phase-3)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK1A=4yoRwSsWXLGy9den5vYNBoEvpBsH4T-=OQiAsqt4zaTrA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDEF3C3.6090100@codesourcery.com>

Yes I agree; as I integrated both of them and post them at once.
sorry about confusion; this patch has to be ignored.

In fact I wanted this patch to be approved first because without which
sys call patch would not compile.

Regards,
Oza.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 06/18/2012 05:08 PM, oza Pawandeep wrote:
>> diff -urN orig/configure.tgt new/configure.tgt
>> --- orig/configure.tgt        2012-06-18 12:36:47.274501400 +0530
>> +++ new/configure.tgt 2012-06-18 12:31:47.335501400 +0530
>> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
>>  arm*-*-linux*)
>>       # Target: ARM based machine running GNU/Linux
>>       gdb_target_obs="arm-tdep.o arm-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o \
>> -                     solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o"
>> +                     solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o linux-record.o"
>>       build_gdbserver=yes
>>       ;;
>>  arm*-*-netbsd* | arm*-*-knetbsd*-gnu)
>>
>> ok to check in ?
>
> It is not good to post the same change twice in different mails.  This
> change makes no sense until your 'arm-syscall record' patch is approved.
>  I noticed that this change has been included in your 'arm-syscall
> record' patch, so I think patch here doesn't have to reviewed.
>
> --
> Yao (齐尧)
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-18 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-07  3:51 oza Pawandeep
2012-06-07 13:41 ` Yao Qi
2012-06-07 17:20   ` oza Pawandeep
2012-06-08  6:09     ` Matt Rice
2012-06-08 12:45       ` oza Pawandeep
2012-06-18  9:08         ` oza Pawandeep
2012-06-18  9:24           ` Yao Qi
2012-06-18 11:49             ` oza Pawandeep [this message]
2012-06-18 14:22               ` Hui Zhu
     [not found]                 ` <CAK1A=4wdqiGCGGQuQHmDB19O=RfjttaG9M83KpBkuUyQPd=0qQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-18 18:55                   ` oza Pawandeep
2012-06-19  1:35                   ` Hui Zhu
2012-06-19  5:13                     ` oza Pawandeep
2012-06-19 16:03                       ` oza Pawandeep

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK1A=4yoRwSsWXLGy9den5vYNBoEvpBsH4T-=OQiAsqt4zaTrA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=oza.pawandeep@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox