From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14121 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2012 11:49:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 14111 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2012 11:49:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_YM X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:49:12 +0000 Received: by wefh52 with SMTP id h52so4578777wef.0 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:49:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.24.193 with SMTP id w1mr23566504wif.5.1340020150945; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:49:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.235.140 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:49:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FDEF3C3.6090100@codesourcery.com> References: <4FD0AF8C.2040908@codesourcery.com> <4FDEF3C3.6090100@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile.in includes linux-record.c to be common for all arch. (arm-reversible>phase-3) From: oza Pawandeep To: Yao Qi Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00577.txt.bz2 Yes I agree; as I integrated both of them and post them at once. sorry about confusion; this patch has to be ignored. In fact I wanted this patch to be approved first because without which sys call patch would not compile. Regards, Oza. On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 06/18/2012 05:08 PM, oza Pawandeep wrote: >> diff -urN orig/configure.tgt new/configure.tgt >> --- orig/configure.tgt =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A02012-06-18 12:36:47.27= 4501400 +0530 >> +++ new/configure.tgt 2012-06-18 12:31:47.335501400 +0530 >> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ >> =C2=A0arm*-*-linux*) >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 # Target: ARM based machine running GNU/Linux >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 gdb_target_obs=3D"arm-tdep.o arm-linux-tdep.o glibc= -tdep.o \ >> - =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o" >> + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o linux-record.o" >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 build_gdbserver=3Dyes >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; >> =C2=A0arm*-*-netbsd* | arm*-*-knetbsd*-gnu) >> >> ok to check in ? > > It is not good to post the same change twice in different mails. =C2=A0Th= is > change makes no sense until your 'arm-syscall record' patch is approved. > =C2=A0I noticed that this change has been included in your 'arm-syscall > record' patch, so I think patch here doesn't have to reviewed. > > -- > Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7) > >