From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] stack: check frame_unwind_caller_id
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH=s-PNZKqi5KMb4-XzR905EgN==7jV8vi-Nrtz=0Jvre9OxMA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455207283-12660-2-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Hi Markus,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Markus Metzger
<markus.t.metzger@intel.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/gdb/stack.c b/gdb/stack.c
> index 89879f3..6e3acc7 100644
> --- a/gdb/stack.c
> +++ b/gdb/stack.c
> @@ -1509,27 +1509,32 @@ frame_info (char *addr_exp, int from_tty)
> wrap_here (" ");
> printf_filtered ("saved %s = ", pc_regname);
>
> - TRY
> - {
> - caller_pc = frame_unwind_caller_pc (fi);
> - caller_pc_p = 1;
> - }
> - CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
> + if (!frame_id_p (frame_unwind_caller_id (fi)))
> + val_print_unavailable (gdb_stdout);
> + else
This patch causes a fail
FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-undefined-ret-addr.exp: info frame
because part of the output "info frame" is changed from "saved rip =
<not saved>"
to "saved rip = <unavailable>". The regression is caught by buildbot too
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/2016-q1/msg05292.html
Could you take a look?
Note that Jan posted a patch
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-04/msg00181.html
fixing test case, but I think the test case itself is valid. Also in the commit
log of adding gdb.dwarf2/dw2-undefined-ret-addr.exp, it is intended to match
"<not saved>" in the test.
--
Yao (齐尧)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-21 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 16:14 [PATCH v3 1/3] frame: add skip_tailcall_frames Markus Metzger
2016-02-11 16:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] stack: check frame_unwind_caller_id Markus Metzger
2016-02-11 16:21 ` Pedro Alves
2016-07-21 16:35 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2016-07-22 7:53 ` Metzger, Markus T
2016-02-11 16:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] btrace, frame: fix crash in get_frame_type Markus Metzger
2016-02-11 16:26 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-11 16:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] frame: add skip_tailcall_frames Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAH=s-PNZKqi5KMb4-XzR905EgN==7jV8vi-Nrtz=0Jvre9OxMA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox