Re: [PATCH v4] Make chained function calls in expressions work

[Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>]

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Siva Chandra wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > Yes, having an additional flag in struct expression would fix the safety
>> > issue.  Moving initialization to evalute_subexp if *pos == 0 would then
>> > no longer be safety issue, but simply enabling use of temporaries in more
>> > cases.
>>
>> Since I have my code already setup in this fashion, I would prefer to
>> go this route unless you see an advantage of going with the solution
>> you suggest below.
>
> Well, I don't think there are any functional advantages as such, but the
> implementation looks a bit cleaner (all the details of temporary handling
> done in infcall.c; fewer interactions between eval.c and infcall.c;
> shorter patch overall).

Shall I go with the thread route then?