Re: [PATCH v8] This commit adds record full support for rv64gc instruction set

[Timur Golubovich <timurgol007@gmail.com>]

Hi!
Thanks for the quick fix. That was a great review, good job.
I'd be happy to continue working on gdb.

>
> On 4/23/25 11:01 AM, Aktemur, Tankut Baris wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 23, 2025 2:14 PM, Guinevere Larsen wrote:
> >> Hi! Sorry for the delay, I'm applying and fixing merge conflicts, and
> >> will be pushing this patch soon!
> >>
> >> If you plan on continue to develop GDB, you may want to get in contact
> >> with Tom Tromey to setup write-after-approval access, so you are able to
> >> push your own patches :)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Guinevere Larsen
> >> She/Her/Hers
> >>
> >> On 4/22/25 2:36 PM, Timur Golubovich wrote:
> >>> Hi!
> >>> Sorry to bother, but It seems like no one else has any questions about
> >>> this patch.
> >>> Maybe then it's possible to merge it?
> > Hello Guinevere, Timur,
> >
> > With this patch, I started getting
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld: riscv-linux-tdep.o: in function `riscv_linux_syscall_record(regcache*, unsigned long)':
> > /user/taktemur/gdb/gdb/riscv-linux-tdep.c:230: undefined reference to `riscv64_canonicalize_syscall(int)'
> >
> > I had configured GDB with --enable-targets=all.
> Oh, oops. the riscv-canonicalize-syscall.c file hasn't been added to the
> makefile, so all targets fails. I'm fixing this and the other build
> issue (a commit from Tromey slightly changing one gdb syscall name) and
> pushing the fix asap
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guinevere Larsen
> She/Her/Hers
>