Re: [RFC] Don't immediately SIGTERM the child of "target remote |".

[Doug Evans <dje@google.com>]

On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:00:51 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
> [...]
>> -      int status;
>> -      kill (state->pid, SIGTERM);
>> +      int rc, status;
>> +      void (*ofunc) ();      /* Previous SIGALRM handler.  */
>                        ^int (or void)
>> +
>> +      /* Don't kill the task right away, give it a chance to shut down cleanly.
>> +      But don't wait forever though.  */
>> +#if defined (HAVE_SIGACTION) && defined (SA_RESTART)
>> +      {
>> +     struct sigaction sa, osa;
>> +     sa.sa_handler = sigalrm_handler;
>> +     sigemptyset (&sa.sa_mask);
>> +     sa.sa_flags = 0;
>> +     sigaction (SIGALRM, &sa, &osa);
>> +     ofunc = osa.sa_handler;
>> +      }
>> +#else
>> +      ofunc = (void (*)()) signal (SIGALRM, sigalrm_handler);
>> +#endif
> [...]
>> +      alarm (0);
>> +      signal (SIGALRM, ofunc);
>
> You should restore OSA, not just OFUNC.

The code was borrowed from remote-sim.c.
In this case I suspect it doesn't matter, but it's just as well to restore osa.