From: Matt Rice <ratmice@gmail.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,
orgads@gmail.com,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix python compatibility with old versions of GDB
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACTLOFqK2652wcovDPedU8KJ-emNYM8pT2OAFd7PnJ57hwL1BQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27c866069cdcc4dc4b5e3cf5d3affe83@polymtl.ca>
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> wrote:
> On 2017-06-13 16:44, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I always configure GDB to use a version-specific data-directory,
>> because I leave old GDB versions (renamed) on my system, so I could
>> still use them after installing a new version. E.g., if the new
>> version turns out to have a bug. I would actually be happier if we
>> changed our installation scripts to do that by default, because the
>> scripts are almost never backward-compatible IME.
>
>
> Can you give more details on what you think could/should be done by default?
>
> For such a use case, I would compile each gdb with a separate prefix (e.g.
> --prefix=/opt/gdb/<version>), which would give each install its own data
> directory. So from my point of view, the "feature" is pretty well-covered.
Is there any argument against appending version to the data-directory
by default?
e.g. gcc configures /usr/lib/gcc/triplet/version? I see a number of
/usr/share/*/[0-9]\.* directories here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-13 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-11 17:48 Orgad Shaneh
2017-06-11 21:09 ` Simon Marchi
2017-06-12 4:31 ` Orgad Shaneh
2017-06-13 11:23 ` Simon Marchi
2017-06-13 12:12 ` Tom Tromey
2017-06-13 12:29 ` Phil Muldoon
2017-06-13 14:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-06-13 17:29 ` Simon Marchi
2017-06-13 17:47 ` Matt Rice [this message]
2017-06-13 18:42 ` Tom Tromey
2017-06-13 19:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-06-13 19:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-06-13 12:53 ` Paul.Koning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACTLOFqK2652wcovDPedU8KJ-emNYM8pT2OAFd7PnJ57hwL1BQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ratmice@gmail.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=orgads@gmail.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox