From: Matt Rice <ratmice@gmail.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Eliminate tui_command_loop
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACTLOFoWEp9RAjA_mv=iXWAtqw_cert7iQ3Dp=ubQ5_+N434Ow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108042110.45405.pedro@codesourcery.com>
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 August 2011 19:10:41, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Looking at the differences between tui/tui-interp.c:tui_command_loop
>> and event-top.c:cli_event_loop,
>> thinking of getting rid of tui_command_loop, the only difference is
>> that tui_command_loop inlines event-loop.c:start_event_loop, and
>> adds this bit:
>>
>> + /* Update gdb output according to TUI mode. Since catch_errors
>> + preserves the uiout from changing, this must be done at top
>> + level of event loop. */
>> + if (tui_active)
>> + current_uiout = tui_out;
>> + else
>> + current_uiout = tui_old_uiout;
>>
>> I thought, "why don't we just use TRY_CATCH instead of
>> catch_errors then?". Turns out we can't as is, because it is
>> TRY_CATCH itself that preserves the uiout from changing...
>
> TRY_CATCH no longer does that. I've applied the
> patch below that conceptually does:
Sorry to report that there is an issue here,
Unforunately the story with this current_uiout frobbing doesn't really
end at catch_errors/TRY_CATCH.
because interps.c:interp_set goes:
current_uiout = interp->interpreter_out;
and tui/tui-io.c:tui_initialize_io goes:
tui_old_uiout = current_uiout = cli_out_new (gdb_stdout);
so after tui_initialize_io,
we have a situation where interp->interpreter_out != current_uiout
then, in 'interpreter_exec_cmd'
old_interp = current_interpreter;
....
interp_set (old_interp, 0);
and now current_uiout has now reverted interpreter->interpreter_out.
this then leads to some issue in the future when we try to output something.
saving and restoring current_uiout in interpreter_exec_cmd
seems to work, but I fear its just a piece of bubble gum holding
things together (and further breaks the already broken abstraction),
this comment from captured_mi_execute_command leads me to think that
if the command does actually want to modify the uiout restoring it to
whatever was the current_uiout could be incorrect..
/* Print the result if there were no errors.
Remember that on the way out of executing a command, you have
to directly use the mi_interp's uiout, since the command could
have reset the interpreter, in which case the current uiout
will most likely crash in the mi_out_* routines. */
I suppose the right thing to do is add interp_set_uiout(interp, uiout)
so tui can control whatever its current_interpreter->interpreter_out field is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-10 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-04 20:11 Pedro Alves
2011-08-04 20:18 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-05 13:02 ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-05 15:11 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-04 20:39 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-08-05 3:49 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-08-05 12:37 ` Pedro Alves
2011-09-10 12:51 ` Matt Rice [this message]
2011-09-10 16:52 ` Matt Rice
2011-09-10 18:47 ` Pedro Alves
2011-09-11 0:46 ` Matt Rice
2011-09-11 14:41 ` Matt Rice
2011-09-13 8:29 ` PR gdb/13175 (Re: Eliminate tui_command_loop) Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACTLOFoWEp9RAjA_mv=iXWAtqw_cert7iQ3Dp=ubQ5_+N434Ow@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ratmice@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox