Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
To: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
	"palves@redhat.com" <palves@redhat.com>,
		"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: x86_64-m32 internal error for multi-thread-step.exp [Re: [PATCH v10 06/28] btrace: change branch trace data structure]
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+C-WL8MjpYaAZPP+8_8H3EF9UVh6H1-CUuRQ8SXx1YsM_riOA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B231E6C4759@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Metzger, Markus T
<markus.t.metzger@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Metzger, Markus T
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 4:08 PM
>> To: Jan Kratochvil
>> Cc: palves@redhat.com; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
>
>> I can't reproduce this fail; I don't get that far.  This test fails for me with
>>
>>       FAIL: gdb.btrace/multi-thread-step.exp: continue to breakpoint: cont
>> to multi-thread-step.c:34 (timeout)
>
> This fail seems to be caused by 588dcc3edbde19f90e76de969dbfa7ab3e17951a
> "Consolidate the custom TUI query hook with the default query hook".  It is not
> related to btrace.
>
> The failing test program looks like this:
>
>     pthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
>     global = 42; /* bp.1 */
>     pthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
>
> There are two threads, both are at bp.1 between the two barriers.  When I now
> delete all breakpoints like this:
>
>     (gdb) del
>     Delete all breakpoints? (y or n) y
>
> and then continue the inferior, only the current thread is resumed.  The other
> thread remains at its current location.  The resumed thread waits at the barrier
> and the test runs into a timeout.
>
> Here's a complete debug session:
>
>     (gdb) b 30
>     Breakpoint 1 at 0x400776: file gdb.btrace/multi-thread-step.c, line 30.
>     (gdb) r
>     Starting program: gdb.btrace/multi-thread-step
>     [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
>     Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
>     [New Thread 0x7ffff7fce700 (LWP 22156)]
>
>     Breakpoint 1, test (arg=0x0) at gdb.btrace/multi-thread-step.c:30
>     30    global = 42; /* bp.1 */
>     (gdb) del
>     Delete all breakpoints? (y or n) y
>      (gdb) info thr
>       Id   Target Id         Frame
>       2    Thread 0x7ffff7fce700 (LWP 22156) "multi-thread-st" test (arg=0x0) at gdb.btrace/multi-thread-step.c:30
>     * 1    Thread 0x7ffff7fcf740 (LWP 22152) "multi-thread-st" test (arg=0x0) at gdb.btrace/multi-thread-step.c:30
>     (gdb) c
>     Continuing.
>     ^C
>     Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
>     0x000000384380c20c in pthread_barrier_wait () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
>     (gdb) info thr
>       Id   Target Id         Frame
>       2    Thread 0x7ffff7fce700 (LWP 22156) "multi-thread-st" test (arg=0x0) at gdb.btrace/multi-thread-step.c:30
>     * 1    Thread 0x7ffff7fcf740 (LWP 22152) "multi-thread-st" 0x000000384380c20c in pthread_barrier_wait () from     /lib64/libpthread.so.0
>
> When I set debug infrun, I get the this:
>
>     (gdb) del
>     Delete all breakpoints? (y or n) y
>      (gdb)
>     infrun: target_wait (-1, status) =
>     infrun:   -1 [process -1],
>     infrun:   status->kind = no-resumed
>     infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_NO_RESUMED (ignoring)
>     infrun: prepare_to_wait
>
> I don't see this with the old query behaviour or when I remove breakpoints like this
>
>     (gdb) del 1

Sorry for the breakage.  I had noticed that multi-thread-step.exp
sometimes fails but I did not realize the non-deterministic failure
was introduced by my patch.  I thought it was a preexisting failure,
but of course I should have empirically confirmed this belief.

>
> regards,
> markus.
> Intel GmbH
> Dornacher Strasse 1
> 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk
> Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
> Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
> Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-23 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-14  8:05 [PATCH v10 00/28] record-btrace: reverse Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 20/28] record-btrace: provide xfer_partial target method Markus Metzger
2014-01-15 15:51   ` Pedro Alves
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 10/28] record-btrace: optionally indent function call history Markus Metzger
2014-01-14 16:07   ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 26/28] record-btrace: show trace from enable location Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 14/28] record-btrace: supply register target methods Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 03/28] btrace: uppercase btrace_read_type Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 18/28] record-btrace, frame: supply target-specific unwinder Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 01/28] btrace, test: fix multi-line btrace tests Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 05/28] frame: add frame_id_build_unavailable_stack_special Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 19/28] target, breakpoint: allow insert/remove breakpoint to be forwarded Markus Metzger
2014-01-15 15:52   ` Pedro Alves
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 15/28] frame, backtrace: allow targets to supply a frame unwinder Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 16/28] frame, cfa: check unwind stop reason first Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 25/28] btrace, gdbserver: read branch trace incrementally Markus Metzger
2014-01-16 17:57   ` Tom Tromey
2014-01-17  8:28     ` Metzger, Markus T
2014-01-20  5:44       ` Tom Tromey
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 13/28] Add target_ops argument to to_prepare_to_store Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 23/28] record-btrace: add record goto target methods Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 24/28] record-btrace: extend unwinder Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 08/28] record-btrace: start counting at one Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 17/28] frame: do not assume unwinding will succeed Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 27/28] target: allow decr_pc_after_break to be defined by the target Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 21/28] record-btrace: add to_wait and to_resume target methods Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 28/28] record-btrace: add (reverse-)stepping support Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 12/28] btrace: add replay position to btrace thread info Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 09/28] btrace: increase buffer size Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 22/28] record-btrace: provide target_find_new_threads method Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 07/28] record-btrace: fix insn range in function call history Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 11/28] record-btrace: make ranges include begin and end Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 02/28] btrace, linux: fix memory leak when reading branch trace Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 04/28] gdbarch: add instruction predicate methods Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 06/28] btrace: change branch trace data structure Markus Metzger
2015-01-08 20:49   ` x86_64-m32 internal error for multi-thread-step.exp [Re: [PATCH v10 06/28] btrace: change branch trace data structure] Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-20 15:19     ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-22 12:30       ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-22 13:36         ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-22 17:37           ` Linux: make target_is_async_p return false when async is off Pedro Alves
2015-01-23 10:39             ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-23 12:34               ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-22 16:37         ` x86_64-m32 internal error for multi-thread-step.exp [Re: [PATCH v10 06/28] btrace: change branch trace data structure] Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-23  7:56           ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-23 16:01             ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-23 16:33             ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-27 18:05               ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-29 16:28                 ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-25 19:56             ` record btrace experience [Re: x86_64-m32 internal error for multi-thread-step.exp [Re: [PATCH v10 06/28] btrace: change branch trace data structure]] Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-26 12:41               ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-27  8:07                 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-27 15:52                   ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-29 19:28                   ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-23 12:55         ` Patrick Palka [this message]
2014-01-15 15:54 ` [PATCH v10 00/28] record-btrace: reverse Pedro Alves
2014-01-16 12:01   ` Metzger, Markus T
2014-01-16 12:37     ` Pedro Alves
2014-01-16 14:35     ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+C-WL8MjpYaAZPP+8_8H3EF9UVh6H1-CUuRQ8SXx1YsM_riOA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=patrick@parcs.ath.cx \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox