Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
To: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, palves@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 15/28] frame, backtrace: allow targets to supply a frame unwinder
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389686678-9039-16-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389686678-9039-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com>

Allow targets to supply their own target-specific frame unwinders; one for
normal frames and one for tailcall frames.  If a target-specific unwinder
is supplied, it will be chosen before any other unwinder.

The original patch has been split into this and the next two patches.

gdb/
2013-02-11  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

	* frame-unwind.c: Include target.h.
	(frame_unwind_try_unwinder): New function with code from ...
	(frame_unwind_find_by_frame): ... here.  New variable
	unwinder_from_target, call also target_get_unwinder)
	(target_get_tailcall_unwinder, and frame_unwind_try_unwinder for it.
	* target.c (target_get_unwinder, target_get_tailcall_unwinder): New.
	* target.h (struct target_ops): New fields to_get_unwinder and
	to_get_tailcall_unwinder.
	(target_get_unwinder, target_get_tailcall_unwinder): New declarations.


---
 gdb/frame-unwind.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 gdb/target.c       | 28 ++++++++++++++++++
 gdb/target.h       | 11 +++++++
 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/frame-unwind.c b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
index f17cda9..fdfea6e 100644
--- a/gdb/frame-unwind.c
+++ b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include "exceptions.h"
 #include "gdb_assert.h"
 #include "gdb_obstack.h"
+#include "target.h"
 
 static struct gdbarch_data *frame_unwind_data;
 
@@ -88,6 +89,48 @@ frame_unwind_append_unwinder (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
   (*ip)->unwinder = unwinder;
 }
 
+/* Call SNIFFER from UNWINDER.  If it succeeded set UNWINDER for
+   THIS_FRAME and return 1.  Otherwise the function keeps THIS_FRAME
+   unchanged and returns 0.  */
+
+static int
+frame_unwind_try_unwinder (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache,
+                          const struct frame_unwind *unwinder)
+{
+  struct cleanup *old_cleanup;
+  volatile struct gdb_exception ex;
+  int res = 0;
+
+  old_cleanup = frame_prepare_for_sniffer (this_frame, unwinder);
+
+  TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
+    {
+      res = unwinder->sniffer (unwinder, this_frame, this_cache);
+    }
+  if (ex.reason < 0 && ex.error == NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR)
+    {
+      /* This usually means that not even the PC is available,
+        thus most unwinders aren't able to determine if they're
+        the best fit.  Keep trying.  Fallback prologue unwinders
+        should always accept the frame.  */
+      do_cleanups (old_cleanup);
+      return 0;
+    }
+  else if (ex.reason < 0)
+    throw_exception (ex);
+  else if (res)
+    {
+      discard_cleanups (old_cleanup);
+      return 1;
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      do_cleanups (old_cleanup);
+      return 0;
+    }
+  gdb_assert_not_reached ("frame_unwind_try_unwinder");
+}
+
 /* Iterate through sniffers for THIS_FRAME frame until one returns with an
    unwinder implementation.  THIS_FRAME->UNWIND must be NULL, it will get set
    by this function.  Possibly initialize THIS_CACHE.  */
@@ -98,37 +141,24 @@ frame_unwind_find_by_frame (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache)
   struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
   struct frame_unwind_table *table = gdbarch_data (gdbarch, frame_unwind_data);
   struct frame_unwind_table_entry *entry;
+  const struct frame_unwind *unwinder_from_target;
+
+  unwinder_from_target = target_get_unwinder ();
+  if (unwinder_from_target != NULL
+      && frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache,
+                                   unwinder_from_target))
+    return;
+
+  unwinder_from_target = target_get_tailcall_unwinder ();
+  if (unwinder_from_target != NULL
+      && frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache,
+                                   unwinder_from_target))
+    return;
 
   for (entry = table->list; entry != NULL; entry = entry->next)
-    {
-      struct cleanup *old_cleanup;
-      volatile struct gdb_exception ex;
-      int res = 0;
-
-      old_cleanup = frame_prepare_for_sniffer (this_frame, entry->unwinder);
-
-      TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
-	{
-	  res = entry->unwinder->sniffer (entry->unwinder, this_frame,
-					  this_cache);
-	}
-      if (ex.reason < 0 && ex.error == NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR)
-	{
-	  /* This usually means that not even the PC is available,
-	     thus most unwinders aren't able to determine if they're
-	     the best fit.  Keep trying.  Fallback prologue unwinders
-	     should always accept the frame.  */
-	}
-      else if (ex.reason < 0)
-	throw_exception (ex);
-      else if (res)
-        {
-          discard_cleanups (old_cleanup);
-          return;
-        }
+    if (frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache, entry->unwinder))
+      return;
 
-      do_cleanups (old_cleanup);
-    }
   internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, _("frame_unwind_find_by_frame failed"));
 }
 
diff --git a/gdb/target.c b/gdb/target.c
index 36064ca..1a4b156 100644
--- a/gdb/target.c
+++ b/gdb/target.c
@@ -4471,6 +4471,34 @@ debug_to_prepare_to_store (struct target_ops *self, struct regcache *regcache)
   fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "target_prepare_to_store ()\n");
 }
 
+/* See target.h.  */
+
+const struct frame_unwind *
+target_get_unwinder (void)
+{
+  struct target_ops *t;
+
+  for (t = current_target.beneath; t != NULL; t = t->beneath)
+    if (t->to_get_unwinder != NULL)
+      return t->to_get_unwinder;
+
+  return NULL;
+}
+
+/* See target.h.  */
+
+const struct frame_unwind *
+target_get_tailcall_unwinder (void)
+{
+  struct target_ops *t;
+
+  for (t = current_target.beneath; t != NULL; t = t->beneath)
+    if (t->to_get_tailcall_unwinder != NULL)
+      return t->to_get_tailcall_unwinder;
+
+  return NULL;
+}
+
 static int
 deprecated_debug_xfer_memory (CORE_ADDR memaddr, bfd_byte *myaddr, int len,
 			      int write, struct mem_attrib *attrib,
diff --git a/gdb/target.h b/gdb/target.h
index 757a927..47eedeb 100644
--- a/gdb/target.h
+++ b/gdb/target.h
@@ -895,6 +895,11 @@ struct target_ops
        non-empty annex.  */
     int (*to_augmented_libraries_svr4_read) (void);
 
+    /* Those unwinders are tried before any other arch unwinders.  Use NULL if
+       it is not used.  */
+    const struct frame_unwind *to_get_unwinder;
+    const struct frame_unwind *to_get_tailcall_unwinder;
+
     int to_magic;
     /* Need sub-structure for target machine related rather than comm related?
      */
@@ -1786,6 +1791,12 @@ extern char *target_fileio_read_stralloc (const char *filename);
 
 extern int target_core_of_thread (ptid_t ptid);
 
+/* See to_get_unwinder in struct target_ops.  */
+extern const struct frame_unwind *target_get_unwinder (void);
+
+/* See to_get_tailcall_unwinder in struct target_ops.  */
+extern const struct frame_unwind *target_get_tailcall_unwinder (void);
+
 /* Verify that the memory in the [MEMADDR, MEMADDR+SIZE) range matches
    the contents of [DATA,DATA+SIZE).  Returns 1 if there's a match, 0
    if there's a mismatch, and -1 if an error is encountered while
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-14  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-14  8:05 [PATCH v10 00/28] record-btrace: reverse Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 03/28] btrace: uppercase btrace_read_type Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 14/28] record-btrace: supply register target methods Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 01/28] btrace, test: fix multi-line btrace tests Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 05/28] frame: add frame_id_build_unavailable_stack_special Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 18/28] record-btrace, frame: supply target-specific unwinder Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 26/28] record-btrace: show trace from enable location Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 10/28] record-btrace: optionally indent function call history Markus Metzger
2014-01-14 16:07   ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v10 20/28] record-btrace: provide xfer_partial target method Markus Metzger
2014-01-15 15:51   ` Pedro Alves
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 22/28] record-btrace: provide target_find_new_threads method Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 12/28] btrace: add replay position to btrace thread info Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 09/28] btrace: increase buffer size Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 04/28] gdbarch: add instruction predicate methods Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 06/28] btrace: change branch trace data structure Markus Metzger
2015-01-08 20:49   ` x86_64-m32 internal error for multi-thread-step.exp [Re: [PATCH v10 06/28] btrace: change branch trace data structure] Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-20 15:19     ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-22 12:30       ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-22 13:36         ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-22 17:37           ` Linux: make target_is_async_p return false when async is off Pedro Alves
2015-01-23 10:39             ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-23 12:34               ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-22 16:37         ` x86_64-m32 internal error for multi-thread-step.exp [Re: [PATCH v10 06/28] btrace: change branch trace data structure] Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-23  7:56           ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-23 16:01             ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-23 16:33             ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-27 18:05               ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-29 16:28                 ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-25 19:56             ` record btrace experience [Re: x86_64-m32 internal error for multi-thread-step.exp [Re: [PATCH v10 06/28] btrace: change branch trace data structure]] Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-26 12:41               ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-27  8:07                 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-27 15:52                   ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-29 19:28                   ` Metzger, Markus T
2015-01-23 12:55         ` x86_64-m32 internal error for multi-thread-step.exp [Re: [PATCH v10 06/28] btrace: change branch trace data structure] Patrick Palka
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 11/28] record-btrace: make ranges include begin and end Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 07/28] record-btrace: fix insn range in function call history Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 02/28] btrace, linux: fix memory leak when reading branch trace Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 23/28] record-btrace: add record goto target methods Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 13/28] Add target_ops argument to to_prepare_to_store Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 24/28] record-btrace: extend unwinder Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 16/28] frame, cfa: check unwind stop reason first Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 19/28] target, breakpoint: allow insert/remove breakpoint to be forwarded Markus Metzger
2014-01-15 15:52   ` Pedro Alves
2014-01-14  8:05 ` Markus Metzger [this message]
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 25/28] btrace, gdbserver: read branch trace incrementally Markus Metzger
2014-01-16 17:57   ` Tom Tromey
2014-01-17  8:28     ` Metzger, Markus T
2014-01-20  5:44       ` Tom Tromey
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 27/28] target: allow decr_pc_after_break to be defined by the target Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 28/28] record-btrace: add (reverse-)stepping support Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 21/28] record-btrace: add to_wait and to_resume target methods Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 08/28] record-btrace: start counting at one Markus Metzger
2014-01-14  8:05 ` [PATCH v10 17/28] frame: do not assume unwinding will succeed Markus Metzger
2014-01-15 15:54 ` [PATCH v10 00/28] record-btrace: reverse Pedro Alves
2014-01-16 12:01   ` Metzger, Markus T
2014-01-16 12:37     ` Pedro Alves
2014-01-16 14:35     ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1389686678-9039-16-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
    --to=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox