From: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
"markus.t.metzger@gmail.com" <markus.t.metzger@gmail.com>,
"jan.kratochvil@redhat.com" <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
"palves@redhat.com" <palves@redhat.com>,
"kettenis@gnu.org" <kettenis@gnu.org>,
"dje@google.com" <dje@google.com>
Subject: RE: [patch v3 01/16] gdbserver, build: add -DGDBSERVER
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B2307AE0654@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d32hr7r2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Tromey [mailto:tromey@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:41 PM
> To: Metzger, Markus T
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; markus.t.metzger@gmail.com; jan.kratochvil@redhat.com; palves@redhat.com;
> kettenis@gnu.org; dje@google.com
> Subject: Re: [patch v3 01/16] gdbserver, build: add -DGDBSERVER
>
> >>>>> "markus" == markus t metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> writes:
>
> Markus> 2012-08-15 Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
> Markus> gdbserver/
> Markus> * Makefile.in: (INTERNAL_CFLAGS): Add -DGDBSERVER
> Markus> (various make rules): Remove -DGDBSERVER
>
> This is ok. Thanks.
Thanks. Just to clarify, when you say it's ok, this means that the changes have been approved and someone may commit them on my behalf, correct?
Did you look at the other patches, as well? The first four are rather small and generic. It would be good if they could be committed independently. This would shorten the series which might make it easier to review the rest.
Regards,
Markus.
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer, Christian Lamprechter
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-24 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-15 7:59 markus.t.metzger
2012-08-23 14:41 ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-24 6:37 ` Metzger, Markus T [this message]
2012-08-24 13:47 ` Tom Tromey
2012-09-10 6:48 ` Metzger, Markus T
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-14 13:01 [patch v3 00/16] branch tracing support for Atom markus.t.metzger
2012-08-14 13:00 ` [patch v3 01/16] gdbserver, build: add -DGDBSERVER markus.t.metzger
2012-08-15 0:41 ` Doug Evans
2012-08-15 7:59 ` Metzger, Markus T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B2307AE0654@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=kettenis@gnu.org \
--cc=markus.t.metzger@gmail.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox