Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>,
	Gopi Kumar Bulusu <gopi@sankhya.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 ] MicroBlaze: Add microblaze_get_next_pcs
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 11:29:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e20ab3e-b7d2-42d8-9444-1985e75f60bd@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93642dcc-4922-4a15-84ae-2404e9d54a17@simark.ca>

On 9/3/25 19:57, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 9/2/25 8:27 AM, Gopi Kumar Bulusu wrote:
>>  From 7f2bacc6fffa6830991da36c2044431237bacba1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Gopi Kumar Bulusu <gopi@sankhya.com>
>> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 09:42:48 +0530
>> Subject: [PATCH v2] MicroBlaze: Add microblaze_get_next_pcs
>>
>> This patch enables software single stepping for gdbserver target
>>
>> * gdb/microblaze-tdep.c: Add microblaze_get_next_pcs
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Holsgrove <david.holsgrove@petalogix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <nathan.rossi@petalogix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bodapati <mbodapat@xilinx.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Gopi Kumar Bulusu <gopi@sankhya.com>
>> ---
>>   gdb/microblaze-tdep.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/microblaze-tdep.c b/gdb/microblaze-tdep.c
>> index 7b58220871c..cacec8ba186 100644
>> --- a/gdb/microblaze-tdep.c
>> +++ b/gdb/microblaze-tdep.c
>> @@ -590,6 +590,95 @@ microblaze_stabs_argument_has_addr (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct type *type)
>>     return (type->length () == 16);
>>   }
>>   
>> +/* Return next pc values : next in sequence and/or branch/return target.  */
>> +
>> +static std::vector<CORE_ADDR>
>> +microblaze_get_next_pcs (regcache *regcache)
>> +{
>> +  CORE_ADDR pc = regcache_read_pc (regcache);
>> +  long insn = microblaze_fetch_instruction (pc);
>> +
>> +  enum microblaze_instr_type insn_type;
>> +  short delay_slots;
>> +  bool isunsignednum;
>> +
>> +  /* If the current instruction is an imm, look at the inst after.  */
>> +
>> +  get_insn_microblaze (insn, &isunsignednum, &insn_type, &delay_slots);
>> +
>> +  int imm;
>> +  bool immfound = false;
>> +
>> +  if (insn_type == immediate_inst)
>> +    {
>> +      int rd, ra, rb;
>> +      immfound = true;
>> +      microblaze_decode_insn (insn, &rd, &ra, &rb, &imm);
>> +      pc += INST_WORD_SIZE;
>> +      insn = microblaze_fetch_instruction (pc);
>> +      get_insn_microblaze (insn, &isunsignednum, &insn_type, &delay_slots);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +  std::optional<CORE_ADDR> next_pc, branch_or_return_pc;
>> +
>> +  /* Compute next instruction address - skip delay slots if any.  */
>> +
>> +  if (insn_type != return_inst)
>> +    next_pc = pc + INST_WORD_SIZE + (delay_slots * INST_WORD_SIZE);
>> +
>> +  microblaze_debug ("single-step insn_type=0x%x pc=0x%lx insn=0x%lx\n",
>> +		    insn_type, pc, insn);
> 
> You shouldn't need the trailing \n.  Apply elsewhere too.
> 
>> +
>> +  /* Compute target instruction address for branch or return instruction.  */
>> +  if (insn_type == branch_inst || insn_type == return_inst)
>> +    {
>> +      int limm;
>> +      int lrd, lra, lrb;
>> +      long ra, rb;
>> +      bool targetvalid;
>> +      bool unconditionalbranch;
> 
> Declare when first use, where possible (ra and rb).
> 
> ra and rb should probably be of the type ULONGEST.
> 
>> +
>> +      microblaze_decode_insn (insn, &lrd, &lra, &lrb, &limm);
>> +      ra = regcache_raw_get_unsigned (regcache, lra);
>> +      rb = regcache_raw_get_unsigned (regcache, lrb);
>> +
>> +      branch_or_return_pc = microblaze_get_target_address (insn, immfound,
>> +		      imm, pc, ra, rb, &targetvalid, &unconditionalbranch);
> 
> Format like this:
> 
>        branch_or_return_pc
> 	= microblaze_get_target_address (insn, immfound,
> 					 imm, pc, ra, rb, &targetvalid,
> 					 &unconditionalbranch);
> 
>> +
>> +      microblaze_debug (
>> +		      "single-step uncondbr=%d targetvalid=%d target=0x%lx\n",
>> +		      unconditionalbranch, targetvalid,
>> +		      branch_or_return_pc.value () );
> 
> Format like this:
> 
>        microblaze_debug ("single-step uncondbr=%d targetvalid=%d target=0x%lx",
> 			unconditionalbranch, targetvalid,
> 			branch_or_return_pc.value ());
> 
>> +
>> +      /* Can't reach next address.  */
>> +      if (unconditionalbranch)
>> +	next_pc.reset ();
>> +
>> +      /* Can't reach a distinct (not here) target address.  */
>> +      if (! targetvalid || branch_or_return_pc == pc ||
>> +		      (next_pc && (branch_or_return_pc == next_pc)))
>> +	  branch_or_return_pc.reset ();
> 
> Format like this:
> 
>        /* Can't reach a distinct (not here) target address.  */
>        if (!targetvalid
> 	  || branch_or_return_pc == pc
> 	  || (next_pc.has_value () && branch_or_return_pc == next_pc))
> 	branch_or_return_pc.reset ();
> 
> 
>> +    } /* if (branch or return instruction).  */
>> +
>> +  /* Create next_pcs vector to return.  */
>> +
>> +  std::vector<CORE_ADDR> next_pcs;
>> +
>> +  if (next_pc)
> 
> .has_value ()
> 
>> +    {
>> +      next_pcs.push_back (next_pc.value () );
> 
> We typically use `*next_pc` to access the value (apply elsewhere too).
> 
> Remove the space before closing parenthesis (apply elsewhere too).
> 
>> +      microblaze_debug ("push_back next_pc(0x%lx)\n", next_pc.value () );
>> +    }
>> +
>> +  if (branch_or_return_pc)
>> +    {
>> +      next_pcs.push_back ( branch_or_return_pc.value () );
>> +      microblaze_debug ("push_back branch_or_return_pc(0x%lx)\n",
>> +		      branch_or_return_pc.value ());
> 
> Align the last line properly.
> 
> The patch LGTM with those fixed.  Let me know if you need help pushing
> the patch.
> 

This caused a buildbreaker on arm-linux with --enable-targets=all and 
--enable-64-bit-bfd.

I've filed a PR ( https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33381 ).

Thanks,
- Tom

> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
> 
> Simon


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-05  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-12  5:30 [PATCH] MicroBlaze: Add microblaze_software_single_step Gopi Kumar Bulusu
2025-08-13 20:11 ` Simon Marchi
2025-08-14 10:28   ` Gopi Kumar Bulusu
2025-09-02 12:27     ` [PATCH v2 ] MicroBlaze: Add microblaze_get_next_pcs Gopi Kumar Bulusu
2025-09-03 17:57       ` Simon Marchi
2025-09-03 18:02         ` Michael Eager
2025-09-04 11:43           ` Gopi Kumar Bulusu
2025-09-04 11:40         ` Gopi Kumar Bulusu
2025-09-05  9:29         ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2025-09-05  9:27           ` Gopi Kumar Bulusu
2025-09-05 13:24             ` Tom Tromey
2025-09-05 13:29               ` Gopi Kumar Bulusu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e20ab3e-b7d2-42d8-9444-1985e75f60bd@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=eager@eagercon.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gopi@sankhya.com \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox