From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
"Aktemur, Tankut Baris" <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Warn about leaked global array
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 18:34:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b35c7f0-11cb-8d55-085e-b5dd0c70de52@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67c6dcab-f83c-3792-d2c3-63ef8e38b0ec@redhat.com>
On 18-05-2020 12:41, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 5/18/20 7:18 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>
>> I managed to find a better way of dealing with this, using "upvar #0".
>> I've also added more comments to the patch.
>
> Cool.
>
>> +# Check global variables not in gdb_global_vars.
>> +
>> +proc check_global_vars { } {
>> + # Sample state after running test.
>> + global gdb_global_vars
>> + set vars [info globals]
>> +
>> + # I'm not sure these two should actually be global, but at least there
>> + # seems to be no harm in having these as globals, given that we don't
>> + # expect to reuse these names as scalars.
>> + set skip [list "expect_out" "spawn_out"]
>
> They can be local or global. See man expect:
>
> Expect takes a rather liberal view of scoping. In particular, variables read
> by commands specific to the Expect program will be sought first from the local
> scope, and if not found, in the global scope. For example, this obviates the need to
> place "global timeout" in every procedure you write that uses expect. On the other hand,
> variables written are always in the local scope (unless a "global" command has been issued).
> The most common problem this causes is when spawn is executed in a procedure.
> Outside the procedure, spawn_id no longer exists, so the spawned process is no
> longer accessible simply because of scoping. Add a "global spawn_id" to such a procedure.
>
> For example, mi_gdb_test does:
>
> proc mi_gdb_test { args } {
> global verbose
> global mi_gdb_prompt
> global GDB expect_out
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> global inferior_exited_re async
> upvar timeout timeout
>
> and then gdb.mi/mi-basics.exp does:
>
> proc test_path_specification {} {
> ...
> global expect_out
>
> ...
> mi_gdb_test "-environment-path" "\\\^done,path=\"(.*)\"" "environment-path"
> set orig_path $expect_out(3,string)
> ...
>
> So making expect_out global allows gdb.mi/mi-basics.exp to reference it.
>
> We could alternatively switch mi_gdb_test (and whatever other procedure
> does a similar thing) to doing "upvar expect_out expect_out" and
> get rid of "global expect_out". Not sure it's worth the bother.
>
OK, that's helpful, thanks for the info.
>> + global gdb_test_file_name
>> + warning "$gdb_test_file_name.exp defined global array $var"
>> +
>> + # If the variable remains set, we won't warn for the next test where
>> + # it's leaked, so unset.
>> + global_unset $var
>
> Tabs / spaces above.
>
Fixed, and resubmitted as part of a patch series that also includes
warning fixes here (
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168771.html ).
Also, fixing the warnings turned out to be more complicated than I
thought, so I ended up moving the bit about how to fix the warning into
a gdb/testsuite/README section (part of patch 2/3).
Thanks,
- Tom
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-13 20:53 [PATCH v8 0/6] Handle already-exited threads in 'stop_all_threads' Pedro Alves
2020-05-13 20:53 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] gdb: protect some 'regcache_read_pc' calls Pedro Alves
2020-05-13 20:53 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] gdb/infrun: move a 'regcache_read_pc' call down to first use Pedro Alves
2020-05-13 20:53 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] gdb/infrun: extract out a code piece into 'mark_non_executing_threads' function Pedro Alves
2020-05-13 20:53 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] gdb: introduce 'all_non_exited_process_targets' and 'switch_to_target_no_thread' Pedro Alves
2020-05-14 8:44 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2020-05-14 11:12 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-14 11:23 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2020-05-13 20:53 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] gdb/infrun: enable/disable thread events of all targets in stop_all_threads Pedro Alves
2020-05-14 8:44 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2020-05-14 11:16 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-14 11:30 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2020-05-13 20:53 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] gdb/infrun: handle already-exited threads when attempting to stop Pedro Alves
2020-05-14 8:47 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2020-05-14 11:16 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-14 11:40 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2020-05-14 18:00 ` Tom de Vries
2020-05-14 18:54 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2020-05-14 18:58 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-15 7:53 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2020-05-15 10:14 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-15 10:17 ` Tom de Vries
2020-05-15 10:35 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-15 11:53 ` Tom de Vries
2020-05-15 12:02 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-15 14:16 ` Tom de Vries
2020-05-15 15:46 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-15 17:17 ` Tom de Vries
2020-05-18 6:18 ` [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Warn about leaked global array Tom de Vries
2020-05-18 10:41 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-19 16:34 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b35c7f0-11cb-8d55-085e-b5dd0c70de52@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox