Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@adacore.com
Subject: Re: Building today's snapshot of GDB with MinGW
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:25:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9876615e-ab54-9fc4-4892-f855901e951e@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83v9j6vxey.fsf@gnu.org>

On 2020-07-02 9:50 a.m., Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 18:09:11 +0300
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@adacore.com
>>
>>> We would not expect GDB to complain for Windows on i386:x86-64.
>>>
>>> The first thing I would do is make sure that the function _initialize_amd64_windows_tdep
>>> gets executed at startup in your GDB.  This is the function that registers a handler for
>>> the tuple (i386:x86-64, Windows).
>>
>> Thanks, I will take a look there and report what I see.
> 
> I started looking at the code, but then I had a eureka moment.  You
> mentioned _initialize_amd64_windows_tdep, so I presume you assumed my
> build is a 64-bit one?  It isn't: it's a 3--bit build, and thus
> _initialize_amd64_windows_tdep is not even compiled into the binary.
> 
> Given that my build is a 32-bit one, it sounds expected to see
> warnings I cited, as they all complain about 64-bit architectures,
> right?
> 
> Incidentally, I wonder why the gdbarch selftest is trying
> architectures that are not supported and not even compiled in.  What
> is the purpose of doing that?

It loops over all the architectures known to bfd.  So I suppose that in BFD,
enabling support for i386 enables support for x86-64, that it all comes
together.  But in GDB, when configuring GDB for a Windows i386 target, we
don't add support for Windows x86-64 targets.  So the warnings you see make
sense.

I noticed that when configuring GDB for an i386/Linux target, we also throw
in support for amd64/Linux as well if $enable_64_bit_bfd is true (which allows
a 32-bit program to read a large > 4GB executable, I suppose):

290 i[34567]86-*-linux*)
291         # Target: Intel 386 running GNU/Linux
292         gdb_target_obs="i386-linux-tdep.o \
293                         glibc-tdep.o \
294                         solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o \
295                         linux-tdep.o linux-record.o"
296         if test "x$enable_64_bit_bfd" = "xyes"; then
297             # Target: GNU/Linux x86-64
298             gdb_target_obs="amd64-linux-tdep.o ${gdb_target_obs}"
299         fi
300         ;;

We could perhaps do the same for Windows, I don't think there would be any
downsides to it, and it could be useful to some people.

Simon


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-02 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-29 18:27 Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-29 20:36 ` Christian Biesinger
2020-06-30 14:09   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-30 22:24     ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-01 15:09       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 13:50         ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 14:25           ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2020-07-02 14:30             ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-02 17:47               ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 14:40             ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-02 17:46               ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 18:21                 ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-02 18:33                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 18:34                     ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-01 15:20       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-01 19:25         ` Christian Biesinger
2020-07-02  2:29           ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 10:18             ` Hannes Domani
2020-07-02 13:20               ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-06 10:39                 ` Hannes Domani
2020-07-06 16:35                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-01 19:25     ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-02 13:46       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-30 16:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-30 18:21   ` Christian Biesinger
2020-06-30 18:28     ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-01 19:29   ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-02  2:31     ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-01 19:30   ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-02 13:39     ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-03 15:25       ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-27  9:49         ` Tom de Vries
2020-07-27 10:05           ` Tom de Vries
2020-07-27 10:26             ` Tom de Vries
2020-07-27 11:48               ` [committed][gdb/build] Fix typo sys/sockets.h -> sys/socket.h Tom de Vries
2020-07-27 12:51                 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-27 14:18               ` Building today's snapshot of GDB with MinGW Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 14:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-03 15:08   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9876615e-ab54-9fc4-4892-f855901e951e@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tromey@adacore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox