From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@adacore.com
Subject: Re: Building today's snapshot of GDB with MinGW
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:25:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9876615e-ab54-9fc4-4892-f855901e951e@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83v9j6vxey.fsf@gnu.org>
On 2020-07-02 9:50 a.m., Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 18:09:11 +0300
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@adacore.com
>>
>>> We would not expect GDB to complain for Windows on i386:x86-64.
>>>
>>> The first thing I would do is make sure that the function _initialize_amd64_windows_tdep
>>> gets executed at startup in your GDB. This is the function that registers a handler for
>>> the tuple (i386:x86-64, Windows).
>>
>> Thanks, I will take a look there and report what I see.
>
> I started looking at the code, but then I had a eureka moment. You
> mentioned _initialize_amd64_windows_tdep, so I presume you assumed my
> build is a 64-bit one? It isn't: it's a 3--bit build, and thus
> _initialize_amd64_windows_tdep is not even compiled into the binary.
>
> Given that my build is a 32-bit one, it sounds expected to see
> warnings I cited, as they all complain about 64-bit architectures,
> right?
>
> Incidentally, I wonder why the gdbarch selftest is trying
> architectures that are not supported and not even compiled in. What
> is the purpose of doing that?
It loops over all the architectures known to bfd. So I suppose that in BFD,
enabling support for i386 enables support for x86-64, that it all comes
together. But in GDB, when configuring GDB for a Windows i386 target, we
don't add support for Windows x86-64 targets. So the warnings you see make
sense.
I noticed that when configuring GDB for an i386/Linux target, we also throw
in support for amd64/Linux as well if $enable_64_bit_bfd is true (which allows
a 32-bit program to read a large > 4GB executable, I suppose):
290 i[34567]86-*-linux*)
291 # Target: Intel 386 running GNU/Linux
292 gdb_target_obs="i386-linux-tdep.o \
293 glibc-tdep.o \
294 solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o \
295 linux-tdep.o linux-record.o"
296 if test "x$enable_64_bit_bfd" = "xyes"; then
297 # Target: GNU/Linux x86-64
298 gdb_target_obs="amd64-linux-tdep.o ${gdb_target_obs}"
299 fi
300 ;;
We could perhaps do the same for Windows, I don't think there would be any
downsides to it, and it could be useful to some people.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-02 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-29 18:27 Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-29 20:36 ` Christian Biesinger
2020-06-30 14:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-30 22:24 ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-01 15:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 13:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 14:25 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2020-07-02 14:30 ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-02 17:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 14:40 ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-02 17:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 18:21 ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-02 18:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 18:34 ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-01 15:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-01 19:25 ` Christian Biesinger
2020-07-02 2:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 10:18 ` Hannes Domani
2020-07-02 13:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-06 10:39 ` Hannes Domani
2020-07-06 16:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-01 19:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-02 13:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-30 16:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-30 18:21 ` Christian Biesinger
2020-06-30 18:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-01 19:29 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-02 2:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-01 19:30 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-02 13:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-03 15:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-27 9:49 ` Tom de Vries
2020-07-27 10:05 ` Tom de Vries
2020-07-27 10:26 ` Tom de Vries
2020-07-27 11:48 ` [committed][gdb/build] Fix typo sys/sockets.h -> sys/socket.h Tom de Vries
2020-07-27 12:51 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-07-27 14:18 ` Building today's snapshot of GDB with MinGW Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 14:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-03 15:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9876615e-ab54-9fc4-4892-f855901e951e@polymtl.ca \
--to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@adacore.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox