From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve i386 prologue analyzer
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 17:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9787-Sat07Aug2004200852+0300-eliz@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41150161.3000306@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sat, 07 Aug 2004 12:20:49 -0400)
> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 12:20:49 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>
> Mark wrote:
>
> > I'd really like this to get some exposure in HEAD before backporting
> > it, but otherwise I do agree.
Sure, but IMHO the change doesn't need too much testing more than it
already got. Don't the developers use CVS HEAD most of the time?
Don't they use it mostly on IA32 (GNU/Linux or otherwise) systems? If
so, the patch is mostly tested.
> Remember, at present MIPS is dead in the water.
With backtraces misbehaving as they do now, I consider the x86 broken
almost as badly as the MIPS. As I told before, because of that bug, I
mistrusted GDB 6.1 to such a degree that I started to use GDB 5.x.
> For how long should we delay pushing out a fix for that?
A week or two won't do much harm, IMHO. But I doubt that we need even
that much.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-07 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-01 21:58 Mark Kettenis
2004-08-02 4:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-02 21:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-03 3:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-06 19:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-08-06 20:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-07 15:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-07 16:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-07 17:11 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-08-07 17:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-07 18:30 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-08-07 18:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-07 22:41 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-08 3:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-08 10:24 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-08 11:08 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-08-08 14:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-08 15:04 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-08-08 19:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-09 13:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-09 15:07 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-08-09 16:46 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-09 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11 0:02 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-11 3:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11 17:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-11 17:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-12 12:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 19:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-12 21:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-08 19:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-08 19:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-07 15:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-18 9:42 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-08-18 17:17 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-08-17 23:34 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-08-17 23:16 Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9787-Sat07Aug2004200852+0300-eliz@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox