From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
Cc: kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve i386 prologue analyzer
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 19:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6654-Sun08Aug2004222553+0300-eliz@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4115FF44.nail59F11C8I0@mindspring.com> (message from Michael Chastain on Sun, 08 Aug 2004 06:24:04 -0400)
> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 06:24:04 -0400
> From: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
>
> eliz> If so, could you please explain why you think it needs any more
> eliz> ``marinating'' in HEAD?
>
> It's a new design.
If that's the problem, we could use the less invasive change that I
posted. It just adds a few more cases to a switch, but leaves the
overall structure of the code intact.
> And this feature interacts with many different external variations.
> For example, I haven't seen anyone test it with gcc 2.
> Or with a program that uses a lot of floating point.
As Mark points out, these issues are either already broken or
unaffected.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-08 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-01 21:58 Mark Kettenis
2004-08-02 4:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-02 21:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-03 3:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-06 19:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-08-06 20:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-07 15:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-07 16:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-07 17:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-07 17:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-07 18:30 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-08-07 18:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-07 22:41 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-08 3:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-08 10:24 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-08 11:08 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-08-08 14:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-08 15:04 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-08-08 19:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-09 13:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-09 15:07 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-08-09 16:46 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-09 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11 0:02 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-11 3:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11 17:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-11 17:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-12 12:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 19:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-12 21:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-08 19:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-08 19:28 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-08-07 15:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-18 9:42 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-08-18 17:17 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-08-17 23:34 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-08-17 23:16 Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6654-Sun08Aug2004222553+0300-eliz@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
--cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox