Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Hayward via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
Cc: "david.spickett@linaro.org" <david.spickett@linaro.org>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>,
	"gdb-patches\\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/24] Add GDB-side remote target support for memory tagging
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:22:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95EFCF01-4654-467A-BEC1-C516F33F44AF@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201022200014.5189-4-luis.machado@linaro.org>



> On 22 Oct 2020, at 20:59, Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> Updates for v2:
> 
> - Add type field to target hooks.
> - Add type data to qMemTags and QMemTags. The packets now look like this:
> 
> qMemTags:<address>,<length>:<type>
> QMemTags:<address>,<length>:<type>:<uninterpreted tag bytes>
> 
> --
> 
> This patch adds memory tagging support to GDB's remote side, with
> packet string checks, new packet support and an implementation of
> the two new tags methods fetch_atags and store_atags.
> 
> GDBserver needs to know how to read/write allocation tags, since that is
> done via ptrace.  It doesn't need to know about logical tags.
> 
> The new packets are:
> 
> qMemTags:<address>,<length>
> --
> 
> Reads tags from the address range [<address>, <address + length>)
> 
> QMemTags:<address>,<length>:<uninterpreted tag bytes>
> --
> Writes the tags represented by the uninterpreted bytes to the address range
> [<address>, <address + length>).
> 
> The interpretation of what to do with the tag bytes is up to the arch-specific
> code.
> 
> Note that these new packets consider the case of packet size overflow as an
> error, given the common use case is to read/write only a few memory tags at
> a time.  Having to use a couple new packets for multi-part transfers wouldn't
> make sense for the little use it would have.
> 

Minor nit: "Having to use a couple new packets”. Even after adding an “of” I’m
not fully sure if that’s what you meant to write.


> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 
> YYYY-MM-DD  Luis Machado  <luis.machado@linaro.org>
> 
> 	* remote.c (PACKET_memory_tagging_feature): New enum.
> 	(remote_memory_tagging_p): New function.
> 	(remote_protocol_features): New "memory-tagging" entry.
> 	(remote_target::remote_query_supported): Handle memory tagging
> 	support.
> 	(remote_target::supports_memory_tagging): Implement.
> 	(create_fmemtags_request, parse_fmemtags_reply)
> 	(create_smemtags_request): New functions.
> 	(remote_target::fetch_memtags): Implement.
> 	(remote_target::store_memtags): Implement.
> 	(_initialize_remote): Add new "memory-tagging-feature"
> 	config command.
> ---
> gdb/remote.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
> index 6e37e5f4e6..fdc7645d47 100644
> --- a/gdb/remote.c
> +++ b/gdb/remote.c
> @@ -2104,6 +2104,10 @@ enum {
>   /* Support TARGET_WAITKIND_NO_RESUMED.  */
>   PACKET_no_resumed,
> 
> +  /* Support for memory tagging, allocation tag fetch/store
> +     packets and the tag violation stop replies.  */
> +  PACKET_memory_tagging_feature,
> +
>   PACKET_MAX
> };
> 
> @@ -2245,6 +2249,14 @@ remote_exec_event_p (struct remote_state *rs)
>   return packet_support (PACKET_exec_event_feature) == PACKET_ENABLE;
> }
> 
> +/* Returns true if memory tagging is supported.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +remote_memory_tagging_p (void)
> +{
> +  return packet_support (PACKET_memory_tagging_feature) == PACKET_ENABLE;
> +}
> +
> /* Insert fork catchpoint target routine.  If fork events are enabled
>    then return success, nothing more to do.  */
> 
> @@ -5246,6 +5258,8 @@ static const struct protocol_feature remote_protocol_features[] = {
>   { "vContSupported", PACKET_DISABLE, remote_supported_packet, PACKET_vContSupported },
>   { "QThreadEvents", PACKET_DISABLE, remote_supported_packet, PACKET_QThreadEvents },
>   { "no-resumed", PACKET_DISABLE, remote_supported_packet, PACKET_no_resumed },
> +  { "memory-tagging", PACKET_DISABLE, remote_supported_packet,
> +    PACKET_memory_tagging_feature },
> };
> 
> static char *remote_support_xml;
> @@ -5340,6 +5354,10 @@ remote_target::remote_query_supported ()
>       if (packet_set_cmd_state (PACKET_no_resumed) != AUTO_BOOLEAN_FALSE)
> 	remote_query_supported_append (&q, "no-resumed+");
> 
> +      if (packet_set_cmd_state (PACKET_memory_tagging_feature)
> +	  != AUTO_BOOLEAN_FALSE)
> +	remote_query_supported_append (&q, "memory-tagging+");
> +
>       /* Keep this one last to work around a gdbserver <= 7.10 bug in
> 	 the qSupported:xmlRegisters=i386 handling.  */
>       if (remote_support_xml != NULL
> @@ -14402,7 +14420,65 @@ set_range_stepping (const char *ignore_args, int from_tty,
> bool
> remote_target::supports_memory_tagging ()
> {
> -  return false;
> +  return remote_memory_tagging_p ();
> +}
> +
> +/* Create the qMemTags packet given ADDRESS, LEN and TYPE.
> +
> +   Return 0 if successful, non-zero otherwise.  */
> +
> +static void
> +create_fmemtags_request (gdb::char_vector &packet, CORE_ADDR address,
> +			 size_t len, int type)
> +{
> +  int addr_size = gdbarch_addr_bit (target_gdbarch ()) / 8;
> +
> +  std::string request = string_printf ("qMemTags:%s,%s:%s",
> +				       phex_nz (address, addr_size),
> +				       phex_nz (len, sizeof (len)),
> +				       phex_nz (type, sizeof (type)));
> +
> +  strcpy (packet.data (), request.c_str ());
> +}
> +
> +/* Parse the qMemTags packet reply into TAGS.
> +
> +   Return 0 if successful, non-zero otherwise.  */
> +
> +static int
> +parse_fmemtags_reply (gdb::char_vector &reply, gdb::byte_vector &tags)
> +{
> +  if (reply.empty () || reply[0] == 'E' || reply[0] != 'm')
> +    return 1;
> +
> +  /* Copy the tag data.  */
> +  tags = hex2bin (reply.data () + 1);
> +
> +  return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Create the QMemTags packet given ADDRESS, LEN, TYPE and TAGS.
> +
> +   Return 0 if successful, non-zero otherwise.  */
> +
> +static void
> +create_smemtags_request (gdb::char_vector &packet, CORE_ADDR address,
> +			 size_t len, int type, const gdb::byte_vector &tags)
> +{
> +  int addr_size = gdbarch_addr_bit (target_gdbarch ()) / 8;
> +
> +  /* Put together the main packet, address and length.  */
> +  std::string request = string_printf ("QMemTags:%s,%s:%s:",
> +				       phex_nz (address, addr_size),
> +				       phex_nz (len, sizeof (len)),
> +				       phex_nz (type, sizeof (type)));
> +  request += bin2hex (tags.data (), tags.size ());
> +
> +  /* Check if we have exceeded the maximum packet size.  */
> +  if (packet.size () < request.length ())
> +    error (_("Contents too big for packet QMemTags."));
> +
> +  strcpy (packet.data (), request.c_str ());
> }
> 
> /* Implement the "fetch_memtags" target_ops method.  */
> @@ -14411,6 +14487,19 @@ int
> remote_target::fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
> 			      gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
> {
> +  /* Make sure the qMemTags packet is supported.  */
> +  if (!remote_memory_tagging_p ())
> +    gdb_assert_not_reached ("remote fetch_memtags called with packet disabled");
> +
> +  struct remote_state *rs = get_remote_state ();
> +
> +  create_fmemtags_request (rs->buf, address, len, type);
> +
> +  putpkt (rs->buf);
> +  getpkt (&rs->buf, 0);
> +
> +  parse_fmemtags_reply (rs->buf, tags);
> +
>   return 0;
> }
> 
> @@ -14420,6 +14509,21 @@ int
> remote_target::store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
> 			      const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
> {
> +  /* Make sure the QMemTags packet is supported.  */
> +  if (!remote_memory_tagging_p ())
> +    gdb_assert_not_reached ("remote store_memtags called with packet disabled");
> +
> +  struct remote_state *rs = get_remote_state ();
> +
> +  create_smemtags_request (rs->buf, address, len, type, tags);
> +
> +  putpkt (rs->buf);
> +  getpkt (&rs->buf, 0);
> +
> +  /* Verify if the request was successful.  */
> +  if (packet_check_result (rs->buf.data ()) != PACKET_OK)
> +    return 1;
> +
>   return 0;
> }
> 
> @@ -14822,6 +14926,9 @@ Show the maximum size of the address (in bits) in a memory packet."), NULL,
>   add_packet_config_cmd (&remote_protocol_packets[PACKET_no_resumed],
> 			 "N stop reply", "no-resumed-stop-reply", 0);
> 
> +  add_packet_config_cmd (&remote_protocol_packets[PACKET_memory_tagging_feature],
> +			 "memory-tagging-feature", "memory-tagging-feature", 0);
> +
>   /* Assert that we've registered "set remote foo-packet" commands
>      for all packet configs.  */
>   {
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-29 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-22 19:59 [PATCH v2 00/24] Memory Tagging Support + AArch64 Linux implementation Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] New target methods for memory tagging support Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-27 13:22   ` Simon Marchi
2020-10-27 13:43     ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-27 13:50       ` Simon Marchi
2020-10-22 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] New gdbarch memory tagging hooks Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] Add GDB-side remote target support for memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-29 14:22   ` Alan Hayward via Gdb-patches [this message]
2020-10-29 14:41     ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] Unit testing for GDB-side remote memory tagging handling Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] GDBserver remote packet support for memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] Unit tests for gdbserver memory tagging remote packets Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] Documentation for " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-23  6:25   ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-10-23 14:07     ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-23 14:33       ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-10-23 14:39         ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] AArch64: Add MTE CPU feature check support Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] AArch64: Add target description/feature for MTE registers Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] AArch64: Add MTE register set support for GDB and gdbserver Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] AArch64: Add MTE ptrace requests Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] AArch64: Implement memory tagging target methods for AArch64 Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-29 14:21   ` Alan Hayward via Gdb-patches
2020-10-29 14:39     ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-29 14:45       ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-29 17:32         ` Alan Hayward via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] Refactor parsing of /proc/<pid>/smaps Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] AArch64: Implement the memory tagging gdbarch hooks Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] AArch64: Add unit testing for logical tag set/get operations Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] AArch64: Report tag violation error information Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] AArch64: Add gdbserver MTE support Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] AArch64: Add MTE register set support for core files Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] New mtag commands Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] Documentation for the new " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-23  6:35   ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-10-23 14:33     ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-23 17:52       ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-10-23 19:04         ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-23 19:34           ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-10-26 14:59           ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-26 15:35             ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-10-26 16:57               ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] Extend "x" and "print" commands to support memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] Document new "x" and "print" memory tagging extensions Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-23  6:37   ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] Add NEWS entry Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-10-23  6:38   ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-10-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] Add memory tagging testcases Luis Machado via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95EFCF01-4654-467A-BEC1-C516F33F44AF@arm.com \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=Alan.Hayward@arm.com \
    --cc=david.spickett@linaro.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@linaro.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox