From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>,
Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] target_set_syscall_catchpoint, use gdb::array_view and bool
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 22:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <942455ac-2fbb-01b6-97ac-0096af2bf9f5@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f91f6f2-9b0f-d750-5d03-30fc23c0613d@FreeBSD.org>
On 2017-12-06 05:38 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 12/3/17 10:18 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> On 2017-10-30 11:59 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On 10/30/17 3:32 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>>> I noticed that we're passing down a data/size pair to
>>>> target_ops::to_set_syscall_catchpoint. This commit makes use of
>>>> gdb::array_view instead. While at it, use bool where appropriate as
>>>> well.
>>>>
>>>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>>>> yyyy-mm-dd Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> * break-catch-syscall.c (insert_catch_syscall)
>>>> (remove_catch_syscall): Adjust to pass reference to
>>>> inf_data->syscalls_counts directly via gdb::array_view.
>>>> * linux-nat.c (linux_child_set_syscall_catchpoint): Adjust to use
>>>> bool and gdb::array_view.
>>>
>>> I believe fbsd-nat.c will need a similar fixup? It doesn't use the
>>> values passed but does implement the target method.
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Can you check if this updated patch builds properly on FreeBSD?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Just one typo below:
>
>> diff --git a/gdb/fbsd-nat.c b/gdb/fbsd-nat.c
>> index 265175a769..1a36414837 100644
>> --- a/gdb/fbsd-nat.c
>> +++ b/gdb/fbsd-nat.c
>> @@ -1163,8 +1163,9 @@ fbsd_remove_exec_catchpoint (struct target_ops *self, int pid)
>>
>> #ifdef HAVE_STRUCT_PTRACE_LWPINFO_PL_SYSCALL_CODE
>> static int
>> -fbsd_set_syscall_catchpoint (struct target_ops *self, int pid, int needed,
>> - int any_count, int table_size, int *table)
>> +fbsd_set_syscall_catchpoint (struct target_ops *self, int pid, bool needed,
>> + int any_count,
>> + gdb::array_view<const int> syscall_counts))
>
> Double close paren here should be a single, but builds fine aside from that, thanks!
>
Thanks, I pushed the patch with that fixed.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-06 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-30 15:32 [PATCH 0/2] Make make-target-delegates grok C++ type names better Pedro Alves
2017-10-30 15:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] Make make-target-delegates grok namespace scope op and template params Pedro Alves
2017-10-30 16:02 ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-03 0:51 ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-03 11:58 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-03 18:00 ` Simon Marchi
2017-10-30 15:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] target_set_syscall_catchpoint, use gdb::array_view and bool Pedro Alves
2017-10-30 15:59 ` John Baldwin
2017-12-03 18:18 ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-06 22:38 ` John Baldwin
2017-12-06 22:50 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2017-10-30 15:59 ` Simon Marchi
2017-10-30 17:05 ` [PATCH] Remove mem_region_vector typedef Simon Marchi
2017-12-03 18:06 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=942455ac-2fbb-01b6-97ac-0096af2bf9f5@ericsson.com \
--to=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jhb@FreeBSD.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=simark@simark.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox