Re: [RFA] Implement 'print -raw-values' and 'set print raw-values on|off'

[Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>]

On 12/4/19 3:43 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2019-08-07 3:39 p.m., Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
>> The option framework documentation was speaking about a 'print -raw'
>> option, but this option does not exist.

Eh.  I think I recall that it would be a good idea to have it,
like I made "bt -full/-no-filters/-hide" options to
supersede "bt full/no-filters/hide", but then dropped it for some
reason.

So +1 from me.

(But see the other email I sent.)

>>
>> This patch implements -raw-values option that tells to ignore the
>> active pretty printers when printing a value.
>> As we already have -raw-frame-arguments, I thought -raw-values
>> was more clear, in particular to differentiate
>>    set print raw-values and set print raw-frame-arguments.
> 
> Hi Philippe,
> 
> I'm just a bit worried about the naming, but I don't have anything better
> to suggest.  I mention it in case you do.  The "set print raw-values" sounds
> like superset of "set print raw-frame-arguments", because in my mind frame
> arguments are printed as values.

But isn't it a superset?

> Other than that, the patch looks fine to me.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves