Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Longo <matthieu.longo@arm.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Luis Machado <luis.machado@amd.com>,
	Luis Machado <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] gdb: rely on the first non-exited thread TPID when reading Linux procfs files
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 16:29:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c4fa73b-5a34-4365-9662-08ca3702c3bd@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e816857d-2c02-4987-b49c-b6c4debb24ed@simark.ca>

On 20/08/2026 16:48, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 7/28/26 10:33 AM, Matthieu Longo wrote:
>> diff --git a/gdb/inferior.h b/gdb/inferior.h
>> index 5c7a52319e7..91dc4e636fd 100644
>> --- a/gdb/inferior.h
>> +++ b/gdb/inferior.h
>> @@ -513,6 +513,17 @@ class inferior : public refcounted_object,
>>    /* Find (non-exited) thread PTID of this inferior.  */
>>    thread_info *find_thread (ptid_t ptid);
>>  
>> +  /* Return the first non-exited thread of this inferior.
>> +
>> +     This is only a best-effort choice of a thread that is expected to still
>> +     exist in the target.  A thread may have exited after GDB last updated its
>> +     thread list, or GDB/gdbserver may have observed the exit but not yet
>> +     propagated it through all layers.  Therefore the returned thread is not
>> +     guaranteed to still be alive when it is later accessed.  This avoids the
>> +     common case where the current thread has exited, but callers must still be
>> +     prepared for the selected thread to no longer exist.  */
>> +  ptid_t first_non_exited_thread () const;
> 
> I think it would be more consistent with the other "find thread" methods
> to return the `thread_info *`
> 

Makes sense. Fixed.

>> diff --git a/gdb/linux-tdep.c b/gdb/linux-tdep.c
>> index 8c53ffd5e89..9bdcc55a0e1 100644
>> --- a/gdb/linux-tdep.c
>> +++ b/gdb/linux-tdep.c
>> @@ -457,6 +457,44 @@ linux_has_shared_address_space (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
>>    return linux_is_uclinux ();
>>  }
>>  
>> +/* Return a PTID that identifies the current process and can be used to
>> +   access procfs safely.
>> +
>> +   The returned PTID is that of the thread-group leader whenever it is
>> +   still alive.  If the leader has already exited, the PTID of the first
>> +   non-exited thread in the current inferior is returned instead.
>> +   This ensures that the returned PTID always refers to a live thread
>> +   whose procfs entries are present and populated.  */
>> +static ptid_t
>> +get_process_reference_ptid (bool verbose = false)
>> +{
>> +  /* Get the current thread.  */
>> +  thread_info *thr = inferior_thread ();
>> +
>> +  /* Construct the PTID of the thread-group leader.  On Linux,
>> +     the leader's LWP ID is equal to the process ID.  */
>> +  ptid_t leader_ptid (thr->ptid.pid (), thr->ptid.pid ());
>> +
>> +  /* Use the thread-group leader if it is still alive.  Otherwise, use
>> +     the first thread that has not exited.  */
>> +  thread_info *leader_thr
>> +    = current_inferior ()->find_thread (leader_ptid);
>> +  ptid_t ptid = (leader_thr == nullptr
>> +		 ? current_inferior ()->first_non_exited_thread ()
>> +		 : leader_ptid);
>> +
>> +  if (!verbose)
>> +    return ptid;
>> +
>> +  if (leader_thr != nullptr)
>> +    gdb_printf (_("process %d\n"), leader_ptid.pid ());
>> +  else
>> +    gdb_printf (_("process %d [Note: information where gathered from LWP %ld " \
>> +		  "as the thread-group leader (LWP=%ld) already exited.]\n"),
>> +		ptid.pid (), ptid.lwp (), leader_ptid.lwp ());
> 
> I don't think the printfs should be part of this getter function.  Move
> it to a separate function called by whoever needs it.  Or just inline
> it, it looks like there is just a single caller that needs it
> (linux_info_proc).
> 

The idea is to inform the user if a fallback occurs.
Now, if I move the printing to another function, I don't have the fetched information anymore, and
cannot figure out easily if a fallback happened and using which thread.

It is ugly but I could not find better.
Do you have a better approach ?

> And really (IIUC), this function only really needs to return a tid (the
> id of one LWP), not a ptid.

Yes, at one exception in linux_fill_prpsinfo() where it needs the PID too.

> 
> Simon

Matthieu


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-24 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-28 14:33 [PATCH v1 0/2] gdb: fix for bug 31207 Matthieu Longo
2026-07-28 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] gdb: rename any_thread_of_inferior to any_non_exited_thread_of_inferior Matthieu Longo
2026-08-20 15:37   ` Simon Marchi
2026-08-24 14:17     ` Matthieu Longo
2026-07-28 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] gdb: rely on the first non-exited thread TPID when reading Linux procfs files Matthieu Longo
2026-08-03  4:48   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-08-13 15:13     ` Matthieu Longo
2026-08-20 15:48   ` Simon Marchi
2026-08-24 15:29     ` Matthieu Longo [this message]
2026-08-24 16:25       ` Matthieu Longo
2026-08-24 16:27         ` Matthieu Longo
2026-08-20 11:09 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] gdb: fix for bug 31207 Matthieu Longo
2026-08-21 15:39   ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c4fa73b-5a34-4365-9662-08ca3702c3bd@arm.com \
    --to=matthieu.longo@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luis.machado.foss@gmail.com \
    --cc=luis.machado@amd.com \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox