Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Edjunior Machado <edjunior@gmail.com>, Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>,
	GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
	Edjunior Machado <emachado@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [pushed + testcase] Re: [PATCH] Fix GDB hang with remote after error from resume
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c13014a-5ff1-db52-03b4-995d300e9248@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJJrRvYOE64R_NEqhhjoS9BP7Bnwc6Bxy18rGUcp-hJ8aGEefg@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/15/2018 05:37 PM, Edjunior Machado wrote:
> (FWIW, at first glance, gdb.linespec/cpcompletion.exp in ppc64 BE seems to
> be one of the main culprits for the whole testrun taking longer (~1h) and
> with considerably more failures than in ppc64le, aparently due to the
> ppc64's function descriptor.)

Sergio, would it possible to include the time it took to run the
testsuite in the messages sent to gdb-testers?  As is, such new
long cascading timeouts are introduced without one realizing,
unless you go look at the builds' pages one by one.

Ideally we'd even get a notification if time jumped
seemingly too much between builds.

And IWBN if the gdb buildbot web frontend had some kind of graph
tracking/plotting test run duration over time (build# for a
given builder), so we could just open some URL and
notice the spikes.  </pie in the sky>.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-15 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-10 16:56 Andreas Arnez
2018-01-12 19:11 ` [pushed + testcase] " Pedro Alves
2018-01-15 14:43   ` Andreas Arnez
2018-01-15 14:53     ` Yao Qi
2018-01-15 15:22       ` Andreas Arnez
2018-01-15 16:10         ` Yao Qi
2018-01-15 17:37       ` Edjunior Machado
2018-01-15 18:17         ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2018-01-15 20:11           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-15 15:18     ` Sergio Durigan Junior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c13014a-5ff1-db52-03b4-995d300e9248@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=edjunior@gmail.com \
    --cc=emachado@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox