From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Edjunior Machado <edjunior@gmail.com>,
Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>,
Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
Edjunior Machado <emachado@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [pushed + testcase] Re: [PATCH] Fix GDB hang with remote after error from resume
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 20:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8rm6fxs.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c13014a-5ff1-db52-03b4-995d300e9248@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:17:09 +0000")
On Monday, January 15 2018, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 01/15/2018 05:37 PM, Edjunior Machado wrote:
>> (FWIW, at first glance, gdb.linespec/cpcompletion.exp in ppc64 BE seems to
>> be one of the main culprits for the whole testrun taking longer (~1h) and
>> with considerably more failures than in ppc64le, aparently due to the
>> ppc64's function descriptor.)
>
> Sergio, would it possible to include the time it took to run the
> testsuite in the messages sent to gdb-testers? As is, such new
> long cascading timeouts are introduced without one realizing,
> unless you go look at the builds' pages one by one.
I'll see about that. There must be a way, because the web interface
provides this information, but I don't remember seeing it before.
> Ideally we'd even get a notification if time jumped
> seemingly too much between builds.
This would take more time to implement, but if there is a way to obtain
the build time, then it should be possible.
> And IWBN if the gdb buildbot web frontend had some kind of graph
> tracking/plotting test run duration over time (build# for a
> given builder), so we could just open some URL and
> notice the spikes. </pie in the sky>.
I'll leave this pie in the sky :-).
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-15 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 16:56 Andreas Arnez
2018-01-12 19:11 ` [pushed + testcase] " Pedro Alves
2018-01-15 14:43 ` Andreas Arnez
2018-01-15 14:53 ` Yao Qi
2018-01-15 15:22 ` Andreas Arnez
2018-01-15 16:10 ` Yao Qi
2018-01-15 17:37 ` Edjunior Machado
2018-01-15 18:17 ` Pedro Alves
2018-01-15 20:11 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2018-01-15 15:18 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h8rm6fxs.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=edjunior@gmail.com \
--cc=emachado@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox