Re: Simplify MI breakpoint setting

[Matt Rice <ratmice@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Vladimir Prus<vladimir@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 September 2009 Matt Rice wrote:

<snip>

>>
>> I don't like how break_command_really looks for the symbol first, then
>> if it fails to find one and
>> pending breakpoints are enabled it will set a pending breakpoint, I
>> think it might sometimes make sense
>> to set a pending breakpoint even though there may be a match.
>
> I am missing something. Pending breakpoint, by definition, is a breakpoint
> that has zero locations. And breakpoint can have zero locations if and only
> if we have failed to find any location that corresponds to the string
> that user has specified. Therefore, pending breakpoint for a found symbol
> or line seems just impossible.
>

I was only speaking about the behaviour of pending breakpoints where
they accumulate a location
when a location matching the user specified string is loaded in the
future, which seems useful to me regardless of it
having a location when using languages where it is possible for the
user specified string to match multiple locations.

But yes it appears that would not be a pending breakpoint by the
definition given by you and manual.