Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix for gdb.parameter('architecture') returning empty string
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y5ilqdoz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGyQ6gzRaxiQyM71_RaX7yRiUWYGrTUpmNKpd92=MRSxShJAgQ@mail.gmail.com>	(Siva Chandra's message of "Sat, 13 Oct 2012 16:43:51 -0700")

>>>>> "Siva" == Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com> writes:

Siva> Currently, gdb.parameter ('architecture') and gdb.parameter ('endian')
Siva> return an empty string.  Attached is a patch which fixes this.  I am
Siva> not very sure if this is the cleanest fix, but I could not come up
Siva> with a better one.

Thanks for the patch.

I'm not certain that this patch is correct.  Also I tend to think (but
of course I am willing to be convinced otherwise) that a different
direction would be preferable.

Siva> +static void
Siva> +on_architecture_change (struct gdbarch *arch)
Siva> +{
Siva> +  architecture_string = gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (arch)->printable_name;
Siva> +  set_endian_string (arch);
Siva> +}

Siva> +    observer_attach_architecture_changed (on_architecture_change);

I suspect this means that gdb.parameter('architecture') will not always
show the same result as "show architecture".

Right now, in the auto case show_architecture will call
get_current_arch:

    struct gdbarch *
    get_current_arch (void)
    {
      if (has_stack_frames ())
        return get_frame_arch (get_selected_frame (NULL));
      else
        return target_gdbarch;
    }

But from what I can tell, the architecture-change observer is not
notified in every situation that might cause that function to return a
different result.


I think a better approach might be to address the problem of "auto" gdb
parameters more globally.  For example, we could add a method to the
appropriate CLI object so that the Python could call this to get the
correct current value.

What do you think of that?

I don't think we'd have to convert all auto parameters at once.
However, this approach would make it easy to convert them as needed.

Tom


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-01 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-13 23:43 Siva Chandra
2012-10-14  7:53 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-10-14  8:37   ` Siva Chandra
2012-10-22  7:16     ` Siva Chandra
2012-11-01 20:19 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-11-02 13:44   ` Siva Chandra
2012-11-02 16:59     ` Tom Tromey
2012-11-02 18:45       ` Siva Chandra
2012-11-02 19:52         ` Tom Tromey
2012-11-05 10:39         ` Phil Muldoon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y5ilqdoz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
    --to=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=sivachandra@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox