Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: "Andrew Burgess" <aburgess@broadcom.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	       "Jan Kratochvil" <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: error reading variable: value has been optimized out
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqzz5eug.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <504092C0.2000602@broadcom.com> (Andrew Burgess's message of	"Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:32:32 +0100")

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess <aburgess@broadcom.com> writes:

Andrew> (3) Structures the size of two registers split over two
Andrew> registers using dwarf piece information.

Andrew> (4) Values the size of a single register split over two
Andrew> registers using dwarf piece information to describe the
Andrew> location.

Andrew> Cases (3) and (4) are not fixed by my original patch, and fail
Andrew> for a different reason.  I could remove these from the test, but
Andrew> I believe the tests are reasonable, or at least not totally
Andrew> crazy, so I'm reluctant to just delete them.  I could just
Andrew> commit the test with these two examples marked as known failing
Andrew> .... or I could fix them :)

Andrew> The problem is this,

Andrew>   - In dwarf2loc.c:dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc_full we create the
Andrew>   computed value from the pieced location information.

Andrew>   - In dwarf2loc.c:read_pieced_value we spot that some of the
Andrew>   registers are missing and mark the computed value as optimized
Andrew>   out.

This scenario seems odd to me.  I think what it means is that the
compiler declares an object as being split between two registers -- but
then also knows that one of the registers is not in fact available.

Does any compiler actually do this?

If it is just a theoretical problem I think we can just declare it
unsupported; and, if we do see it, try reporting it as a compiler bug
first.  After all, the compiler could just emit an empty piece instead.

Tom


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-12 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-24 12:11 Andrew Burgess
2012-08-26 18:22 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-27 15:46   ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-31  9:59     ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-03 15:07     ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-31 10:33   ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-01  8:17     ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-03  8:32       ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-03 11:24       ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-03 15:38         ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-03 15:17     ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-04 16:58       ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-05 18:54         ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-12 17:30     ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-09-13 12:34       ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-14 19:02         ` Tom Tromey
2012-09-14 21:39           ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-17 16:57             ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-19 14:29               ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-20 13:28                 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-21 17:19                   ` Andrew Burgess

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wqzz5eug.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
    --to=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=aburgess@broadcom.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox