From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: "Andrew Burgess" <aburgess@broadcom.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
"Jan Kratochvil" <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: error reading variable: value has been optimized out
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqzz5eug.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <504092C0.2000602@broadcom.com> (Andrew Burgess's message of "Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:32:32 +0100")
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess <aburgess@broadcom.com> writes:
Andrew> (3) Structures the size of two registers split over two
Andrew> registers using dwarf piece information.
Andrew> (4) Values the size of a single register split over two
Andrew> registers using dwarf piece information to describe the
Andrew> location.
Andrew> Cases (3) and (4) are not fixed by my original patch, and fail
Andrew> for a different reason. I could remove these from the test, but
Andrew> I believe the tests are reasonable, or at least not totally
Andrew> crazy, so I'm reluctant to just delete them. I could just
Andrew> commit the test with these two examples marked as known failing
Andrew> .... or I could fix them :)
Andrew> The problem is this,
Andrew> - In dwarf2loc.c:dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc_full we create the
Andrew> computed value from the pieced location information.
Andrew> - In dwarf2loc.c:read_pieced_value we spot that some of the
Andrew> registers are missing and mark the computed value as optimized
Andrew> out.
This scenario seems odd to me. I think what it means is that the
compiler declares an object as being split between two registers -- but
then also knows that one of the registers is not in fact available.
Does any compiler actually do this?
If it is just a theoretical problem I think we can just declare it
unsupported; and, if we do see it, try reporting it as a compiler bug
first. After all, the compiler could just emit an empty piece instead.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-12 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-24 12:11 Andrew Burgess
2012-08-26 18:22 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-27 15:46 ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-31 9:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-03 15:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-31 10:33 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-01 8:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-03 8:32 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-03 11:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-03 15:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-03 15:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-04 16:58 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-05 18:54 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-12 17:30 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-09-13 12:34 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-14 19:02 ` Tom Tromey
2012-09-14 21:39 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-17 16:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-19 14:29 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-20 13:28 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-21 17:19 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wqzz5eug.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=aburgess@broadcom.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox